Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals

V. Quality of final yield controlled by nutrient therapy

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Quantitative methods were developed for predicting and controlling concentrations of nutrients in grain and straw of oats and spring wheat based on a given or a predicted chemical composition of the young plant at a fixed Dry Matter weight level.

Models of prognosis and therapy were based on relationships between grain yield and concentrations of various nutrients in grain and straw and on relationships between concentrations of the nutrients. These relationships were derived from selected data referring to ‘pure’-effect concentrations of various nutrients at a 1 g DM weight-level and obtained from pot experiments. Such relationships between grain yield and ‘pure’-effect concentrations were non-ambiguous and clear due to the elimination of the Steenbjerg-effect.

The methods, tested by comparing predicted with experimentally obtained concentrations of nutrients in grain and straw, proved reliable for N, Ca and Na in grain and for N, P, K, Mg, Ca and Na in straw by fairly high and highly significant correlation coefficients (r=0.7−0.9 andp<0.001).

The methods of therapy are closely related to previously developed methods of diagnosis of the nutritional status of the young plant and of prognosis and control of quantity of yield.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bates, T. E. 1971 Factors affecting critical nutrient concentrations in plants and their evaluation: A review. Soil Sci.112, 116–130.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Friis-Nielsen, B. 1973 Growth, water and nutrient status of plants in relation to patterns of variations in concentrations of dry matter and nutrient elements in base-to-top leaves. II. Relations between distribution of concentrations of dry matter and nutrient elements in tomato plants. Plant and Soil39, 677–686.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jakobsen, S. T. and Steenbjerg, F. 1964 The concentrations of various plant nutrients in oats as influenced by potassium and magnesium nutrition. Proc. IV. Coll. Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems, Brussels 1962, 174–188. Publ. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.

  4. Levy, G. 1968 Utilisation pratique de l'analyse foliaire dans l'étude de la nutrition d'essences forestières. Rev. For. Fr.4, 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lundegårdh, H. 1941 Die Tripelanalyse. Kungl. Lantbr. Högsk. Ann.9, 127–221.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Møller Nielsen, J. 1973 Kornplanters ernæringstilstand. Vurderet og reguleret udfra planternes kemiske sammensætning. Thesis. Den kgl. Vet. og Landbohøjsk. København, 1972 pp. 247. English summary (The nutritional status of cereals, evaluated and adjusted on the basis of the chemical composition of the plants).

  7. Møller Nielsen, J. and Friis-Nielsen, B. 1976 Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals. I. Dry matter weight level. Plant and Soil45, 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Møller Nielsen, J. and Friis-Nielsen, B. 1976 Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals. II. Pure-effect of a nutrient. Plant and Soil45, 339–351.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Møller Nielsen, J. and Friis-Nielsen, B. 1976 Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals. III. Methods of diagnosis and yield prognosis. Plant and Soil45, 647–658.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Møller Nielsen, J. 1979 Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals. IV. Quantity of final yield controlled by nutrient therapy. Plant and Soil52, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ramon, A. R. and Urich, A. 1964 Critical Zinc concentrations and leaf minerals of sugar beet plants. Soil Sci.97, 152–167.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, P. E. 1962 Mineral analysis of plant tissues. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.13, 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steenbjerg, F. 1945 Om kemiske planteanalyser og deres anvendelse. (English summary: On chemical analyses of plants and their use). Tidsskr. Pltavl.49, 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Steenbjerg, F. 1950 On the relative contents of plant nutrients in crops. Trans. 4 Intern. Congr. Soil Sci.1, 254–258.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Steenbjerg, F. 1951 Yield curves and chemical plant analyses. Plant and Soil3, 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steenbjerg, F. 1952 Verification of chemical soil and plant analyses: General considerations. Trans. Intern. Soil Sci. Joint Meeting of Comm.2 and Comm.4 I 309–322.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steenbjerg, F. 1954 Manuring, Plant production and the chemcial composition of the plant. Plant and Soil5, 226–242.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, J.M. Evaluation and control of the nutritional status of cereals. Plant Soil 52, 245–268 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184564

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02184564

Key Words

Navigation