Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 82, Issue 3, pp 315–327 | Cite as

Selection for improved nitrogen fixation inGlycine max (L.) Merr. andPhaseolus vulgaris L.

  • P. H. Graham
  • S. R. Temple
Article

Summary

While symbiotic nitrogen (N2) fixation byG. max andP. vulgaris reduces their need for combined N, N2 fixation under field conditions is rarely maximized. This paper reviews constraints to N2 fixation in these species, then examines the genetic variability recorded for traits affecting N2 fixation and the further work needed in this area. It considers emerging programs for the improvement of N2 fixation inG. max andP. vulgaris and pays particular attention to methodological considerations.

Key words

Breeding Competition Glycine max Nitrogen fixation Nodulation Phaseolus vulgaris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abu-Shakra S S, Phillips D A and Huffaker R C 1978 Nitrogen fixation and delayed leaf senescence in soybeans. Science 199, 973–975.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boone L V and Welch L F 1972 The more nitrogen in corn, the less in our water supply. Ill. Res. 14, 5–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bromfield E S P and Kumar Rao J V D K 1983 Studies on fast and slow-growingRhizobium sp. nodulatingCajanus cajan andCicer arietinum. Ann. Appl. Biol. 102, 485–493.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown J C and Devine T E 1980 Inheritance of tolerance or resistance to manganese toxicity in soybeans. Agron. J. 72, 898–904.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caldwell B E 1966 Inheritance of a strain specific ineffective nodulation in soybean. Crop Sci. 6, 427–428.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Caldwell B E and Vest G 1968 Effects ofRhizobium japonicum strains in soybean yields. Crop Sci. 10, 19–21.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chowdhury M S and Doto A L 1982 Biological nitrogen fixation as a criterion for soybean breeding: preliminary results.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris. CIAT, Cali. pp 45–48.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) 1975 Annual report of the bean program, 58 p.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    CIAT (Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical) 1976 Annual report of the bean program, 83 p.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dart P J, Day J, Islam R, and Döbereiner J 1976 Symbiosis in tropical grain legumes: some effects of temperature and the composition of the rooting medium.In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants. Ed. P S Nutman, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp 361–383.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Delannay X, Rodgers D M and Palmer R G 1983 Relative genetic contributions among ancestral lines to North American soybean cultivars. Crop Sci. 23, 944–949.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Devine T E and Breithaupt B H 1980 Significance of incompatibility reactions ofRhizobium japonicum strains with soybean host genotypes. Crop Sci. 20, 269–271.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Devine T E and Weber D F 1977 Genetic specificity of nodulation. Euphytica 26, 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Döbereiner J 1982 The Brazilian program in biological nitrogen fixation.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris CIAT, Cali. pp 687–688.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eaglesham A R J 1982 Assessing the nitrogen contribution of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in monoculture and intercropped.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris. CIAT, Cali. pp 641–646.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ellis W R 1982 Inoculum persistance and the rhizosphere competence ofRhizobium japonicum. PhD Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul. 161 p.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans J 1982 Response of soybean. —Rhizobium symbiosis to mineral nitrogen. Plant and Soil 66, 439–442.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ferrera-Cerrato R 1980 Inoculacion deRhizobium phaseoli a differentes especies del generoPhaseolus originarias de Mexico. Rev. Lat-Amer. Microbiol. 22, 175–180.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Foy C D, Armiger W H, Fleming A L and Zaumeyer W J 1967 Differential tolerance of dry bean, snapbean, and lima bean varieties to an acid soil high in exchangeable aluminium. Agron. J. 59, 561–563.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Friere J R J 1977 Inoculation of soybeans.In Exploiting the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis in Tropical Agriculture. Eds. J M Vincentet al. Univ. Hawaii Coll. Trop. Agric. Misc. Publ. 145, 335–379.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freire J R J, Kolling J, Godinho I T and Pereira J S 1976 Competicão, sobrevivencia e especializacão simbiotica de estirpes deRhizobium japonicum em variedade de soja. Anais de IVa Reuniao Conjunta da Pesquiza da Soja RS/SC, Santa Maria RS, Brasil, pp 93–102.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graham P H 1978 Some problems and potentials of field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Latin America. Field Crops Res. 1, 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graham P H 1979 Influence of temperature on growth and nitrogen fixation in cultivars ofPhaseolus vulgaris L., inoculated withRhizobium. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 93, 365–370.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Graham P H 1981 Some problems of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation inPhaseolus vulgaris L.: A review. Field Crops Res. 4, 93–112.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Graham P H 1983 Plant factors affecting nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation and its Ecological Basis. Ed. M Alexander. Plenum, New York.In press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Graham P H and Halliday J 1977 Inoculation and nitrogen fixation in the genusPhaseolus. In Exploiting the Legume-Rhizobium Symbiosis in Tropical Agriculture. Eds. J M Vincentet al. Univ. Hawaii Coll. Tropic. Agric. Misc. Publ. 145, 313–334.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Graham P H and Rosas J C 1977 Nodule development and nitrogen fixation in cultivars ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. as influenced by planting density. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 88, 503–508.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Graham P H and Rosas J C 1978 Plant and nodule development and nitrogen fixation in climbing cultivars ofPhaseolus vulgaris L. grown in monoculture or associated withZea mays L. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 90, 19–29.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graham P H, Viteri S E, Mackie F, Vargas A T, and Palacios A 1982 Variation in acid soil tolerance among strains ofRhizobium phaseoli. Field Crops Res. 5, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Greder R R 1983 Heritabilities and associations of nodule mass and recovery ofBrady-rhizobium japonicum strain 110 in soybeans. M.Sc. Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, 43 p.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ham G E 1978 Interactions ofGlycine max andRhizobium japonicum.In Advances of Legume Science. Eds. R J Summerfield and A H Bunting, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew pp 289–296.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hardy R W F, Burns R C and Holsten R D 1973 Applications of the acetylene-ethylene assay for measurement of nitrogen fixation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 47–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hohenburg J S, Munns D N and Tucker C L 1982Rhizobium-host specificities inPhaseolus coccineus L. andPhaseolus vulgaris L. Crop Sci. 22, 455–459.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Holl F B and LaRue T A 1975 Genetics of legume plant hosts. Proc. 1st. Intern. Symp. N2 Fixation Washington State University, Pullman. pp 391–399.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hubbell D H and Elkan G H 1967 Correlation of physiological characteristics with nodulating ability inRhizobium japonicum. Can. J. Microbiol. 13, 235–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hymowitz T and Kaizuma N 1981 Soybean seed protein electrophoresis profiles from 15 Asian countries or regions: hypotheses on paths of dissemination of soybeans from China. Econ. Bot. 35, 10–23.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). 1979 Annual Report, pp 152.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Israel D W 1981 Cultivar andRhizobium strain effects on nitrogen fixation and remobilization by soybeans. Agron. J. 73, 509–516.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson H W, Means U M and Weber C R 1965 Competition for nodule sites between strains ofRhizobium japonicum applied as inoculum and strains in the soil. Agron. J. 57, 179–185.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Johnson J W, Welch L F and Kurtz L T 1975 Environmental implications of N fixation by soybeans. J. Environ. Qual. 4, 303–306.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Keyser H H, Bohlool B B, Hu T S and Weber D F 1982 Fast-growing rhizobia isolated from root-nodules of soybean. Science 215, 1631–1632.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kvien C S 1979 Soybean genotype as a factor in recovery of introducedRhizobium japonicum strains. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Minnesota, 145 p.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kvien C S, Ham G E and Lambert J W 1981 Recovery of introducedRhizobium japonicum strains by soybean genotypes. Agron. J. 73, 900–905.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lie T A 1981 Gene centres: a source for genetic variants in symbiotic nitrogen fixation: host induced ineffectivity inPisum sativum ecotype fulvum. Plant and Soil 61, 125–134.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lindemann W C and Ham G E 1979 Soybean plant growth, nodulation and nitrogen fixation as affected by root temperature. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 1134–1137.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lowendorf H S and Alexander M 1983 Identification ofRhizobium phaseoli strains that are tolerant or sensitive to soil acidity. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 45, 737–742.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    McFerson J R 1983 Genetic breeding studies of dinitrogen fixation in common bean,Phaseolus vulgaris L., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin, 147 p.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    McFerson J R, Bliss F A and Rosas J C 1982 Selection for enhanced nitrogen fixation in common beans,Phaseolus vulgaris.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris. CIAT, Cali pp 39–44.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    McNiel D L 1982 Variation in ability ofRhizobium japonicum strains to nodulate soybeans and maintain fixation in the presence of nitrate. Appl. Envir. Microbiol. 44, 647–652.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Maier R J, Campbell N E R, Hanus F J, Simpson F B, Russell S A and Evans H J 1978 Expression of hydrogenase activity in free-livingRhizobium japonicum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 3258–3262.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Materon L A and Vincent J M 1980 Host specificity and interstrain competition with soybean rhizobia. Field Crops Res. 3, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Miranda L N and Lobato E 1978 Tolerancia de variedades de feijao e de trigo ao aluminio e a baixa disponibilidade de fosforo no solo. R. Bras. Ci. Solo 2, 44–50.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Misra A and Misra H C 1975 Effect of legumes on associated and subsequent crops. Ind. J. Genetics Plant Breed. 35, 239–241.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Munevar F and Wollum A G 1982 Response of soybean plants to high root temperatures as affected by plant cultivars andRhizobium strain. Agron. J. 74, 138–142.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Munns D N, Fox R L and Koch B L 1977 Influence of lime on nitrogen fixation by tropical and temperature legumes. Plant and Soil 46, 591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Munns D N, Hohenberg J S, Righetti T and Lauter D J 1981 Soil acidity tolerance of symbiotic and nitrogen fertilized soybeans. Agron. J. 73, 407–410.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Nangju D 1980 Soybean response to indigenous rhizobia as influenced by cultivar origin. Agron. J. 72, 403–406.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Norman A G 1944 Inoculation and nitrogen nutrition of soybeans. Soy. Digest 4(11), 41–42.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Norman A G and Krampitz L D 1946 The nitrogen nutrition of soybeans: II Effect of available soil nitrogen on growth and nitrogen fixation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 10, 191–196.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ohki K, Wilson D O and Anderson O E 1980 Manganese deficiency and toxicity sensitivities of soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 72, 713–716.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Parker M B, Boswell F C, Ohki K, Shuman L M and Wilson D O 1981 Manganese effects on yield and nutrient concentration in leaves and seed of soybean cultivars. Agron. J. 73, 643–646.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Patterson T G and LaRue T A 1983 Nitrogen fixation by soybeans: seasonal and cultivar effects and comparison of estimates. Crop Sci. 23, 488–492.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Pulver E L, Brockman F and Wien H C 1982 Nodulation of soybean cultivars withRhizobium spp and their response to inoculation withR. japonicum. Crop Sci. 22, 1065–1070.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ranga Rao V, Thottapilly G and Ayanaba A 1982 Studies on the persistence of introduced strains ofRhizobium japonicum in soil during fallow, and the effects of soybean growth and yield.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris. CIAT, Cali pp 309–315.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Rennie R J and Kemp G A 1981 Dinitrogen fixation in pea beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) as affected by growth stage and temperature regime. Can. J. Bot. 59, 1181–1188.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Rennie R J and Kemp G A 1981 Selection for dinitrogen fixing ability inPhaseolus vulgaris L. at two low temperature regimes. Euphytica 30, 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Rennie R J and Kemp G A 1982 Dinitrogen fixation inPhaseolus vulgaris at low temperatures: interaction of temperature growth stage and time of inoculation. Can. J. Bot. 60, 1433–1437.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Rennie R J and Kemp G A 1983 N2 fixation in field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) quantified by15N isotope dilution II. Effect of cultivars of beans. Agron. J. 75, 645–649.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Rennie R J, Rennie D A and Fried M 1978 Concepts of15N usage in dinitrogen fixation studies.In Isotopes in Biological Nitrogen Fixation. IAEA (Vienna), pp 107–133.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Rosas J C 1983 Partitioning of dry matter, nitrogen fixation and seed yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) influenced by plant genotype and nitrogen fertilization. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin 127 p.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Rupela O P and Dart P J 1982 Screening for nodulation characteristics in chickpea and subsequent generation of seeds.In Biological Nitrogen Fixation Technology for Tropical Agriculture. Eds. P H Graham and S C Harris. CIAT, Cali. pp 57–61.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ruschel A P, Vose P B, Matsui E, Victoria R L and Saito S M T 1982 Field evaluation of N2 fixation and N utilization byPhaseolus bean varieties determined by15N isotope dilution. Plant and Soil 65, 397–407.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ruschel A P, Vose P B, Victoria R L and Salati E 1979 Comparison of isotope techniques and non-nodulating isolines to study the effect of ammonium fertilization on dinitrogen fixation in soybean,Glycine max. Plant and Soil 53, 513–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Sapra V T, Mehbrahtu T and Mugwira L M 1982 Soybean germplasm and cultivar aluminum tolerance in nutrient solution and Bladen clay loam soil. Agron. J. 74, 687–690.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Saxena M C and Tilak K V B R 1975 Response to inoculation in soybean and its residual effect on wheat. Ind. J. Agron. 20, 369–370.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Spain J M, Francis C A, Howeler R H and Calvo F 1975 Differential species and varietal tolerance to soil acidity in tropical crops and pastures.In Soil Management in Tropical America. Eds. E Bornemisza and A Alvarado. North Carolina State Univ., pp 308–329.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    St. Martin S K 1982 Effective population size for the soybean improvement program in maturity groups 00 to IV. Crop Sci. 22, 151–152.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Trinick M J, Rhodes R L and Galbreath J H 1983 Competition between fast- and slow-growing tropical legume rhizobia for nodulation ofVigna unguiculata. Plant and Soil 73, 105–115.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Vavilov N I 1951 The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants (English translation), The Ronald Press Co., New York.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Vest G 1970 Rj3 — a gene conditioning ineffective nodulation in soybean. Crop Sci. 10, 34–35.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Vest G and Caldwell B E 1972 Rj4 — a gene conditioning ineffective nodulation in soybeans. Crop Sci. 12, 692–694.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Vest G, Weber D F and Sloger C 1973 Nodulation and nitrogen fixation.In Soybeans: Improvement, Production and Uses. Ed. B E Caldwell. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 353–390.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Weaver R W and Frederick L R 1974 Effect of inoculant size on the competitive nodulation ofGlycine max (L.) Merril. II Field studies. Agron. J. 66, 233–236.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Weber C R 1966 Nodulating and non-nodulating soybean isolines 1. Agronomic and chemical attributes. Agron. J. 58, 43–46.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Wehrhan C and Allard R W 1965 The detection and measurement of the effects of individual genes involved in the inheritance of a quantitative trait in wheat. Genetics 51, 109–119.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Welch L F 1972 More nutrients are added to soil than are hauled away in crops. Ill. Res. 14, 3–4.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Westermann D T, Kleinkopf G E, Porter L K and Leggett G E 1981 Nitrogen sources for bean seed production. Agron. J. 73, 660–664.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Westermann D T and Kolar J J 1978 Symbiotic N2 (C2H2) fixation in beans. Crop Sci. 18, 986–990.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Williams L F and Lynch D L 1954 Inheritance of a non-nodulating character in the soybean. Agron. J. 46, 28–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Graham
    • 1
  • S. R. Temple
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. of Soil ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Bean ProgramCentro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT)Colombia

Personalised recommendations