Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of plant species, weather variables and chemical composition of plant material on decomposition in a tropical grassland

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The decomposition of litter and roots ofChenopodium album, Desmostachya bipinnata and mixed grass samples for a period of 402 days and ofDichanthium annulatum andSesbania bispinosa for a period of 278 days was studied in a tropical grassland. Litter bags positioned at midcanopy height, soil surface and at five cm depth below the soil surface and root bags placed at 5, 15, 25 and 35 cm depths belowground were used. For the total study period, the cumulative weight loss in litter bags was: Chenopodium=76–100%; Desmostachya=33–98%; Dichanthium=26–96%; mixed grass=43–99% and Sesbania=25–99%. The weight loss in root bags was: Chenopodium=93–100%; Desmostachya=47–56%; Dichanthium=71–87%; mixed grass=61–82%; Sesbania=87–100%. The nature of plant species affected decomposition rates. The position of litter/root bags also affected the decomposition rates. The mean relative decomposition rates of litter as well as of root material were found to be highest in rainy season and lowest in winter months. Rainfall, particularly the frequency of rainfall, was an important factor affecting decomposition rates. The litter species characterized by highest concentration of nitrogen, ash, acid detergent cell wall component and lowest concentration of carbon, cellulose and lignin, decomposed rapidly. In the case of roots, the material having high nitrogen, carbon, cellulose and ash content and low C/N ratio and lignin content decomposed rapidly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Anderson, J. M. 1973 The breakdown and decomposition of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) leaf litter in two deciduous woodland soils. I. Breakdown, leaching and decomposition. Oecologia Berlin12, 251–274.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clancy, M. J. and Wilson, R. K. 1966 Development and application of a new chemical method for predicting the digestibility and intake of herbage samples. 10th Int. Grassld. Congr. 445–452

  3. Clark, F. E. 1949 Soil microorganisms and plant roots. Adv. Agron.1, 241–288.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark, F. E. and Paul, E. A. 1970 The microflora of grassland. Adv. Agron.22, 375–435.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cornforth, I. S. 1970 Leaf fall in a tropical rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol.7, 403–435.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards, C. S. 1973 Determination of lignin and cellulose in forages by extraction with triethylene glycol. J. Sci. Food Agric.24, 381–388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards, P. J. 1977 Studies of mineral cycling in a montane rain forest in New Guinea. II. The production and disappearance of litter. J. Ecol.65, 971–992.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta, S. R. 1979 Soil respiration and decomposition of litter and root in a grassland ecosystem. Ph. D. thesis. Department of Botany, Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gupta, S. R. and Singh, J. S. 1977 Decomposition of litter in a tropical grassland. Pedobiologia17, 234–237.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jenny, H., Gessel, S. P. and Bingham, F. T. 1949 Comparative study of decomposition rates of organic matter in temperate and tropical regions. Soil Sci.68, 419–432.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karenlampi, L. 1971 Weight loss of leaf litter on forest soil surface in relation to weather at kevo station. Finnis Lapland. Rep. Kevo subarct. Res. Stn.8, 101–103.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lunt, H. A. 1931 The carbon-organic matter factor in forest soil humus. Soil Sci.32, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Macfadyen, A. 1963 The contribution of the microfauna to total soil metabolism.In Soil Organism, pp 3–16 Eds. J. Doeksen and J. van der Drift. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Madge, D. S. 1965 Leaffall and litter disappearance in a tropical forest. Pedobiologia5, 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piper, C. S. 1944 Soil and plant analysis, New York.

  16. Pugh, G. J. F. 1970 A study of fungi in the rhizosphere and the root surface of plants growing in primitive soils.tIn Methods of study in Soil Ecology, pp 159–164. Ed. J. Phillipson. IBP/UNESCO Symp. Paris.

  17. Satchell, J. E. and Lowe, D. G. 1967 Selection of leaf litter byLumbricus terrestris.In Progress in Soil Biology, pp 102–119. Eds. O. Graff and J. E. Satchell, Braunschweig, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sims, P. L. and Singh, J. S. 1978 The structure and function of ten western North American grasslands. IV. Compartmental transfers and system transfer functions. J. Ecol.66, 983–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, J. S. and Coleman, D. C. 1977 Evaluation of functional root biomass and translocation of photoassimilated14C in a shortgrass praire ecosystem.In The belowground ecosystem: A synthesis of plant associated processes, pp 123–131. Ed. J. K. Marshall. Rage Sci. Dept. Ser.26, Colorado State Univ.

  20. Singh, J. S. and Gupta, S. R. 1977 Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot. Rev.43, 449–528.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Singh, J. S. and Yadava, P. S. 1974 Seasonal variation in composition plant biomass and net primary productivity of a tropical grassland at Kurukshetra, India. Ecol. Monogr.44, 351–376.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Triska, F. J., Sedell, J. R. and Buckley, B. 1975 The processing of conifer and hardwood leaves in two coniferous forest streams: II. Biochemical and nutrient changes. Verh. Int. Ver. Limnol.19, 1628–1639.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Waksman, S. A. and Gerretsen, F. C. 1931 Influence of temperature and moisture upon the nature and extent of decomposition of plant residues by microorganisms. Ecology12, 33–60.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Waksman, S. A. and Tenney, F. G. 1928 Composition of natural organic material and their decomposition in the soil. III. The influence of nature of plant upon the rapidity of its decomposition. Soil Sci.26, 155–171.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wiegert, R. G. and McGinnis, J. T. 1975 Annual production and disappearance of detritus in three South Carolina old fields. Ecology56, 129–140.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Witkamp, M. 1966 Decomposition of leaf litter in relation to environmental conditions, microflora and microbial respiration. Ecology47, 194–201.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, S.R., Singh, J.S. The effect of plant species, weather variables and chemical composition of plant material on decomposition in a tropical grassland. Plant Soil 59, 99–117 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02183596

Key Words

Navigation