Skip to main content
Log in

Utilization of the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and symbiotic effectiveness inRhizobium meliloti

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The utilization of the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and related compounds was studied in strains ofRhizobium meliloti having different symbiotic effectiveness. In general, the very effective (VE) strains used these compounds as sole carbon source better than the ineffective (I) strains. However, a significant different was observed between VE and I strains in their ability to use acetate or oxaloacetate for growth. In fact, at a concentration of 2 mM, 80% of the VE strains used acetate or oxaloacetate white 50% of the I strains used acetate and none was able to grow on oxaloacetate. No correlation was found between the symbiotic effectiveness of the strains and their ATP content, when grown on mannitol. The highest ATP content (9.21 nM×μg protein−1) was found in the I strain S20 and the lowest (0.69 nM×μg protein−1 was found in the effective strain S8. Numerical analysis of the patterns of utilization of the TCA cycle intermediates and related compounds indicated that the 49 strains tested formed 11 distinct groups at 86% similarity, according to Jaccard's coefficient. Several strains showed unique patterns of utilization and can be clearly identified under laboratory conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antoun H, Bordeleau L M and Prevost D 1982 Strain identification inRhizobium meliloti using the antibiotic disk susceptibility test. Plant and Soil 66, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bordeleau L M, Antoun H and Lachance R A 1977 Effets des souches deRhizobium meliloti et des coupes successive de la luzerne (Medicago sativa) sur la fixation symbiotique d'azote. Can. J. Plant Sci. 57, 433–439.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brockwell J, Gault R R, Mytton L R, Schwinghamer E A and Gibson A H 1981 Intrastrain instability in symbiotic effectiveness inRhizobium spp.In Current perspectives in nitrogen fixation. Proc. 4th. Int. Symp. on Nitrogen Fixation. Eds Gibson A H and Newton W E, Australian Academy of Science, p 433.

  4. Denarie J and Truchet G 1979 La symbioseRhizobium légumineuses: rôles respectifs des partenaires. Physiol. Vég. 17, 643–667.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dogra R C and Vyas S R 1978 Oxydative metabolism of a pigmented mutant ofRhizobium melilotti and its revertants. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 44, 117–123.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gottschalk G 1979 Bacterial Metabolism. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Graham P H 1964 Studies on the utilization of carbohydrates and Krebs cycle intermediates by Rhizobia using an agar plate method. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. J. Microbiol. Serol. 30, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heichel G H and Vance C P 1979 Nitrate-N andRhizobium strain roles in alfalfa seedling nodulation and growth. Crop Sci. 19, 512–518.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jakubczack E and Leclerc H 1980 Mesure de l'ATP bactérien par bioluminescence: étude critique des mëthodes d'extraction. Ann. Biol. Clin. 38, 297–304.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Josey D P, Beymon J L, Johnston A W B and Beringer J E 1979 Strain identification inRhizobium using intrinsic antibiotic resistance. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 46, 343–350.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lowry O H, Rosebrough N J, Farr A L and Randall R J 1951 Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oleinikov R R, Stotnikov G G, Shemakhanova N M and Belov Y M 1971 ATP content in cells of ative and inactiveRhizobium strains. Mikrobiologiya 40, 971–972.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rawsthorne S, Minchin F R, Summerfield R J, Cookson C and Coombs J 1980 Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in legume root nodules. Phytochemistry 19, 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronson C W and Primrose S B 1979 Carbohydrate metabolism inRhizobium trifolii: identification and symbriotic properties of mutants. J Gen. Microbiol. 112, 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roughley R J 1976 The production of high quality inoculants and their contribution to legume yield.In Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in Plants. Ed. P S Nutman, Cambridge University Press, pp 125–136.

  16. Simpson J R and Gibson A H 1970 A comparison of the effectiveness of two strains ofRhizobium trifolii withTrifolium subterraneum in agar in three soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2, 295–305.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sneath P H A and Sokal R R 1973 Numerical Taxonomy. W H Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stotnicki M L and Rolfe B G 1978 Differential stimulation and inhibition of growth ofRhizobium trifolii strain T1 and otherRhizobium species by various carbon sources. Microbios 20, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Vincent J M 1970 A Manual for the practical Study of Root Nodule Bacteria. IBP Handb. No. 15 Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford and Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vries G E de 1980 Transport of sugars and organic acids inRhizobium leguminosarum and their role in symbiosis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Leiden, Leiden, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution no.225 Station de Recherches, Agriculture Canada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antoun, H., Bordeleau, L.M. & Sauvageau, R. Utilization of the tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates and symbiotic effectiveness inRhizobium meliloti . Plant Soil 77, 29–38 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182809

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182809

Key words

Navigation