Summary
Several hundred halophytes from salt marshes and salt deserts of the world have been evaluated in our laboratory at various degrees of intensity, and a few have been selected for development as crops. The development of the cultivars and the basic biology of the plants is being studied in Delaware in the United States. Agronomic testing, feeding trials, and development of the best agronomic practices are taking place in the saline desert at the American University in Cairo research station in Sadat City. Our present efforts focus primarily on three forages, one grain, and one vegetable.Sporobolus virginicus cultivars for both hay and pasture are being tested. ADistichlis spicata cultivar for hay has been identified, andSpartina patens is being evaluated as a hay as well. Although we do not yet have the data for a full year's growth in Egypt, forage yields of these various cultivars, when harvested as hay crops, range to 6.9 or more tons per acre, depending on the salinity and other environmental conditions, and the crude protein content as indicated by the nitrogen content ranges from 6 to 10%. Cultivars having the most useful agronomic qualities have been identified and are being increased in quantity. The grain cropKosteletzkya virginica is a perennial, producing a seed which resembles millet; its whole seeds contain approximately 25% protein and 15% oil. The yields of one of our better cultivars are about 1460 kg/ha (1300 lb/acre) when grown under 25‰ salinity. The vegetableAtriplex triangularis (similar to spinach) has been under mass selection for four years; a cultivar has been identified and seed is now being increased for this species.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Donovan L A 1982 Anaerobic substrate tolerance inSporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth. Masters thesis. Univ. of Del., College of Marine Studies, Lewes, DE
Donovan L A and Gallagher J L 1984 Anaerobic substrate tolerance inSporobolus virginicas (L.) Kunth. Am. J. Bot. (In press).
Gallagher J L 1979 Growth and element compositional responses ofSporobolus virginicus (L.) Kunth. to substrate salinity and nitrogen. Am. Mid. Nat. 102, 68–75.
Gallagher J L 1983 Seasonal patterns in recoverable underground reserves inSpartina alterniflora Loisel. Am. J. Bot. 70, 212–215.
Gallagher J L and Plumley F G 1979 Underground biomass profiles and productivity in Atlantic coastal marshes. Am. J. Bot. 66, 156–161.
Gallagher J L, Reimold R J, Linthurst R A and Pfeiffer W J 1980 Aerial production, mortality and mineral accumulation — export dynamics inSpartina alterniflora andJuncus roemerianus plant stands in a Georgia salt marsh. Ecology 61, 303–312.
Gibbons E 1962 Stalking the Wild Asparagus. David McKay Co., NY.
Hitchcock A S 1971 Manual of Grasses of the United States. Dover Publ., New York.
Islam M N, Wilson C A and Watkins T R 1982 Nutritional evaluation of seashore mallow seed,Kosteletzkya virginica. J. Agric. Food Chem. 30, 1197–1198.
Leithead H L, Yarlett L L and Shiflet T N 1971 100 Native forage grasses in 11 southern states. U.S. Dept. Agric. Handbook 389. Washington, D.C.
Linthurst R A and Reimold R J 1978 Estimated net aerial primary productivity of selected estuarine angiosperms in Maine, Delaware and Georgia. Ecology 59, 945–55.
Norlyn J D and Epstein E 1982 Barley production: irrigation with seawater on coastal soil.In Biosaline Research: A Look to the Future. Ed. A San Pietro. pp 525–529. Plenum Press, New York.
Nabors M W, Daniels A, Nadolny L and Brown C 1975 Sodium chloride tolerant lines of tobacco cells. Plant Sci. Let. 4, 155–159.
Richards R A, Dennett C, Schaller C W, Qualset C O and Epstein E 1982 Selection for yield in cereals for salt-affected croplands.In Biosaline Research: A Look to the Future. Ed. A San Pietro. pp 535–537. Plenum Press, New York.
Rumer S L 1982 A comparison of fluctuating vs constant salinity stress on plants. Masters thesis. University of Delaware, College of Marine Studies, Lewes, DE.
Rush D W and Epstein E 1976 Genotypic responses to salinity: differences between salttolerant genotypes of the tomato. Plant Physiol. 57, 162–166.
Sacher R F, Staples R C and Robinson R W 1982 Saline tolerance in hybrids ofLycopersicon esculentum × Solanum pennellii and selected breeding lines.In Biosaline Research: A Look to the Future. Ed. A San Pietro. pp 325–336. Plenum Press, New York.
Somers G F 1975 Seed-bearing halophytes as food plants. DEL-SG-75, College of Marine Studies, Univ. of Del., Newark.
Somers G F 1979 Natural halophytes as a potential resource for new salt tolerant crops: some progress and prospects.In The Biosaline Concept: An Approach to the Utilization of Underexploited Resources. Ed. A Hollaender et al. pp 101–115. Plenum Press, New York.
Urbina J C M 1980 Determinacion del rango de tolerancia al ensaletramento per el pasto salado (Distichlis spicata (L.)) Greene, en suelos del ex Lago de Texcoco. Ciencia Forestal 4, 22, 21–44.
Weigart R G and Evans F C 1967 Investigation of secondary productivity in grasslands.In Secondary Productivity in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Ed. K Petruservicz. pp 499–518. Pol. Akad. Nauk.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallagher, J.L. Halophytic crops for cultivation at seawater salinity. Plant Soil 89, 323–336 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182251
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182251