Plant and Soil

, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp 93–99 | Cite as

Response of honelocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) to soil solution aluminium

  • Edward Sucoff
  • Cynthia Buschena
  • Paul Bloom


Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) seedlings were grown for 72 days in soil from a BC horizon of a Spodosol altered by adding four levels of AlCl3. Saturated paste extracts from controls to the highest AlCl3 treatment contained, respectively, 85 to 831 μM Al, 834 to 163 μM Ca and 316 to 35 μM Mg and had a pH of 4.4 to 4.0 Leaf, stem, and root concentrations of Al and P increased while those of Mg, Ca, and Zn decreased with increasing levels of Al. Growth decreased as Al, Al/Ca, and Al/Mg ratios in the extract increased. Growth was negatively related to tissue concentrations of Al, P, and Zn and positively related to tissue Mg and Ca. Growth was more closely correlated to elemental concentrations in the saturated paste extracts than in the SrCl2 extracts (1 part 0.01M SrCl2: 1 part moist soil).

Key words

Al phytotoxicity Gledistsia triacanthos soil solution Al 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alva A K, Edwards D G, Asher C J and Blamey F P C 1986 Relationships between root length of soybean and calculated activities of aluminum monomers in nutrient solution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 959–962.Google Scholar
  2. Andrew C S and Vanden Berg P J 1973 The influence of aluminum on phosphate sorption by whole plants and excised roots of some pasture legumes. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 24, 341–351.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom P R, Weaver R M and McBride M B 1978 The spectrophotometric and fluorometric determination of aluminum with 8-hydroxyquinoline and butyl-acetate extraction. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 713–716.Google Scholar
  4. Driscoll C T 1984 A procedure for the fractionation of aqueous aluminum in dilute acidic waters. Intern J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 16, 267–283.Google Scholar
  5. Erdmann G G, Metzger F T and Oberg R R 1979 Macronutrient deficiency symptoms in seedlings of four northern hardwoods. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-53. 36 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Foy C D 1984 Physiologic effects of hydrogen, aluminum, and manganese toxicities in acid soil. In Soil Acidity and Liming. Ed. F Adams. pp 59–97. Agron Mono 12, ASA, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  7. Foy C D, Chaney R L and White M C 1978 The physiology of metal toxicity in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29, 511–566.Google Scholar
  8. Grime H 1987 The effect of Mg and Ca on the expression of Al-toxicity. In abstracts of Symposium: Plant-Soil Interactions at Low pH. Univ of Alberta.Google Scholar
  9. Hacskaylo J, Finn R F and Vimmerstedt J P 1969 Deficiency symptoms of some forest trees. Ohio Agric. Res. and Dev. Cent. Wooster. Ohio.Google Scholar
  10. Hecht-Bucholz Ch, Jorns C A and Keil P 1987 Effects of excess aluminum and manganese on Norway spruce seedlings as related to magnesium nutrition. J. Plant Nutr. 10, 1103–1110.Google Scholar
  11. Humphreys F and Truman R 1964 Aluminum and phosphorus requirements ofPinus radiata. Plant and Soil 20, 131–134.Google Scholar
  12. Kruger E 1987 Growth, Nutrient Status, and Root Hydraulic Conductivity ofQuercus rubra L. in Response to Solution Aluminum and Calcium. Ms Thesis. University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Leaf A L 1968 K. Mg, and S deficiencies in forest trees. In Forest Fertilization: Theory and Practice. Tenn. Valley Authority. Muscle Shoals. AL. pp 88–122.Google Scholar
  14. Malavolta E, Haag H P, Mello F A F, and Brasil M O C 1962 On the mineral nutrition of some tropical crops. Intern Potash Inst. Berne. 155 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Matzner E and Ulrich B 1985 “Waldsterben”: Our dying forests—Part II. Implications of the chemical soil condition for forest decline. Experentia 41, 578–84.Google Scholar
  16. McCormick L H and Borden F Y 1974 The occurrence of aluminum-phosphate precipitate in plant roots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 931–934.Google Scholar
  17. Pavan M A, Bingham F T and Pratt P F 1982 Toxicity of aluminum to coffee in ultisols and oxisols amended with CaCO3, MgCO3, and CaSO4·2H2O. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 1201–1207.Google Scholar
  18. Phares R E 1971 Fertilization tests with potted red oak seedlings. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Note NC-114. 4 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Schaedle M, Thornton F C, and Raynal D J 1986 Nonmetabolic binding of aluminum to roots of loblolly pine and honeylocust. J Plant Nutr. 9, 1227–1238.Google Scholar
  20. Stone E L 1968 Micronutrient nutrition of forest trees: A review. In Forest Fertilization: Theory and Practice. pp 132–75. Tenn Valley Authority. Muscle Shoals, AL.Google Scholar
  21. Thornton F C, Schaedle M, Raynal D J and Zipperer C 1986a Effect of aluminum on honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) in solution culture. J. Exp Bot. 37, 775–85.Google Scholar
  22. Thornton F C, Schaedle M, and Raynal D J 1986 Effects of aluminum on growth, development, and nutrient composition of honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L.) seedlings. Tree Physiology 2, 307–316.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Ulrich B and Matzner E 1986 Anthropogenic and natural acidification in terrestial ecosystems. Experietia 42, 344–350.Google Scholar
  24. Zech von W and Popp E 1983 Magnesiummangel einer der Grunde fur das Fichten- und Tannensterben in NO-Bayern. Forstw. Cbl. 102, 50–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Sucoff
    • 1
  • Cynthia Buschena
    • 1
  • Paul Bloom
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ResourcesUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Soil ScienceUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations