Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the efficiency of urea, aqueous ammonia and ammonium sulphate as nitrogen fertilizers

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Nitrogen-15 labelled urea, aqueous NH3 and (NH4)2SO4 were applied to soils contained in pots. The fertilizers were injected in 5 cm3 of solution, 3.5 cm below the soil surface, to simulate a fertilizer band in the field. Ryegrass (Lolium perenne) was planted, and several cuttings and roots were harvested. Efficiency was determined as the recovery of fertilizer-N in the plant tissues and soil.

Total recovery varied from 94 to 100%. There was no significant difference between the total recovery of the 3 fertilizer forms, although recovery in the soil component was lower for (NH4)2SO4 than for urea or NH3. There was a significant difference in total recovery between soils due to the soil component. Only small amounts of15N were not recovered, whereas laboratory experiments reported elsewhere had demonstrated that substantial gaseous losses of N as N2, N2O and NO +NO2 occurred in these soils during nitrification of added NH3 fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Broadbent, F. E. and Nakashima, T. 1967 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.31, 648–652.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burge, W. D. and Broadbent, F. E. 1961 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.25, 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chalk, P. M. and Keeney, D. R. 1975 Agron. J.67, 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chalk, P. M. and Keeney, D. R. 1975 Agron. J.67, 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalk, P. M. et al. 1975 Agron. J.67, 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Douglas, L. A.et al. 1980 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (in press).

  7. Freney, J. R. et al. 1978 Nature273, 530–532.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardner, W. R. 1965In Soil Nitrogen. Eds. W. V. Bartholomew, and F. E. Clark. Am. Soc. Agron, Madison, Wis., 550–572.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keeney, D. R. and Bremner, J. M. 1967 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.31, 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nelson, D. W. and Bremner, J. M. 1969 Soil Biol. Biochem.1, 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pang, P. C. et al. 1975 Can. J. Soil Sci.55, 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, C. J. and Chalk, P. M. 1979 Soil Biol. Biochem.11, 515–519.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, C. J. and Chalk, P. M. 1979 Anal. Chim. Acta104, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, C. J. and Chalk, P. M. 1980 Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. (in press).

  15. Smith, C. J. and Chalk, P. M. 1979 Soil Sci. 1979 Soil Sci.128, 327–330.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wetselaar, R. et al. 1972 Plant and Soil36, 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zamyatina, V. B. 1971In Nitrogen-15 in Soil-Plant Studies. Proc. Meeting F.A.O./I.A.E.A., 35–45.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, C.J., Chalk, P.M. Comparison of the efficiency of urea, aqueous ammonia and ammonium sulphate as nitrogen fertilizers. Plant Soil 55, 333–337 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181813

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02181813

Key words

Navigation