Ocular torsion: Sensorimotor principles

  • David L. Guyton
Clinical Investigations

Abstract

Eye movements are basically limited to two degrees of freedom, as described by Donders' and Listing's laws. Complex patterns of innervation maintain the geometric constancy of the retinal meridians, presumably via visual feedback acting through orientation-specific neurons in the cortex. Interactions between torsional and vertical movements of the eyes can be demonstrated by stimulating ocular torsion and detecting secondary vertical deviations. Geometric considerations show that significant peripheral disparities occur with convergence and eye movements, dictating large Panum's fusional areas in the periphery. Good visual acuity in man must thus be limited to the fovea, but the large peripheral Panum's fusional areas allow sensory cyclofusion of up to 8°. In addition, motor cyclofusion occurs in the presence of large-field stimuli, further helping to minimize problems from torsional diplopia both in normal individuals and in patients with ocular motor pareses.

Keywords

Public Health Visual Acuity Visual Feedback Vertical Movement Normal Individual 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balliet R, Nakayama K (1978) Training of voluntary torsion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 17:303–314Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Crone RA (1973) Diplopia. Exerpta Medica, Amsterdam, p 55Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crone RA, Everhard-Halm Y (1975) Optically induced eye torsion. I. Fusional cyclovergence. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 195:231–239Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duke-Elder S (1958) System of ophthalmology. I. The eye in evolution. Mosby, St Louis, p 660Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guyton DL (1983) Clinical assessment of ocular torsion. Am Orthoptic J 33:7–15Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guyton DL, Noorden GK von (1977) Antagonism between cyclorotations and vertical rotations of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 16:40–41Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guyton DL, Noorden GR von (1978) Sensory adaptations to cyclodeviations. In: Reinecke RD (ed) Strabismus. Grune & Stratton, New York, pp 399–403Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herzau V, Joos-Kratsch E (1984) Objective and subjective evaluation of cyclovergence and cyclofusion. Doc Ophthalmol 58:85–90Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kertesz AE, Hampton DR (1983) The unreliability of subjective probe estimates of cyclofusional vergence performance. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 220:100–101Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kertesz AE, Lee HJ (1986) Sensory interaction among neighboring retinal regions during fusional compensation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:79Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kertesz AE, Sullivan MJ (1978) The effect of stimulus size on human cyclofusional response. Vision Res 18:567–571Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kushner BJ (1985) The role of ocular torsion on the etiology of A and V patterns. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 22:171–179Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakayama K (1977) Geometrical and physiological aspects of depth perception. In: Benton S (ed) Image processing. Proc Soc Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 120:1–9Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nakayama K (1978) A new method of determining the primary position of the eye using Listing's law. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 55:331–336Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nakayama K (1983) Kinematics of normal and stabismic eyes. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ (eds) Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworths, Boston, pp 543–564Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Noorden GK von (1984) Clinical and theoretical aspects of cyclotropia. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 21:126–132Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robertson K, Schor C (1986) Changes in retinal correspondence induced by disparity vergence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27:79Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schor CM (1983) Fixation disparity and vergence adaptation. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KJ (eds) Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworths, Boston, pp 465–516Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schor CM, Tyler CW (1981) Spatio-temporal properties of Panum's fusional area. Vision Res 21:683–692Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schor C, Wesson M, Robertson KM (1986) Combined effects of spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity upon fixation disparity. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 63:619–626Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tyler CW (1983) Sensory processing of binocular disparity. In: Schor CM, Ciuffreda KV (eds) Vergence eye movements: basic and clinical aspects. Butterworths, Boston, pp 199–296Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Walls GL (1942) The vertebrate eye and its adaptive radiation. Cranbrook Press, Bloomfield Hills, Mich, pp 295, 306, 312Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Westheimer G (1973) Saccadic eye movements. In: Zikmund V (ed) The oculomotor system and brain functions. Publishing House of the Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, p 62Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Westheimer G, Blair SM (1972) Mapping the visual sensory onto the visual motor system. Invest Ophthalmol 11:490–496Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Guyton
    • 1
  1. 1.The Wilmer Ophthalmological InstituteThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations