Biogeochemistry

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 25–39 | Cite as

Exchange of reduced sulfur gases between lichens and the atmosphere

  • C. Gries
  • T. H. NashIII
  • J. Kesselmeier
Article

Abstract

Fourteen lichens, 10 green algal lichens and four cyanolichens, as well as a cyanobacterium emitted significant quantities of H2S (0.01–0.04 pmol g dw−1 s−1) and DMS (0.005–0.025 pmol g dw−1 s−1) but were sinks for COS (0.015–0.14 pmol g dw−1 s−1). In contrast, exchange of CH3SH and CS2 were sporatic and inconsistent. Although some interspecific variation occurred for the first three gases, exchange rates were relatively uniform and were not influenced by irradiance conditions. In contrast to DMS and H2S emission, COS uptake was strongly influenced by degree of thallus hydration. Because lichen dominated systems cover extensive terrestrial habitats, COS uptake is potentially important in the world's sulfur budget.

Key words

biogeochemical cycling carbonyl sulfide dimethyl sulfide hydrogen sulfide lichens trace sulfur gas exchange 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreae MO & Jaeschke WA (1992) Exchange of sulphur between biosphere and atmosphere over temperate and tropical regions. In: Howarth RW, Stewart JWB & Ivanow MV (Eds) Sulphur Cycling on the Continents (pp 27–61). Scope, John Wiley & Sons LtdGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartell U, Hofmann U, Hofmann R, Kreuzburg B, Andreae MO & Kesselmeier J (1993) COS and H2S fluxes over a wet meadow in relation to photosynthetic activity: An analysis of measurements made on 6 September 1990. Atmosph. Environ. 27A: 1851–1864Google Scholar
  3. Bates TS, Lamb BK, Guenther A, Dignon J & Stoiber RE (1992) Sulfur emissions to the atmosphere from natural sources. J. Atmos. Chem. 14: 315–337Google Scholar
  4. Berresheim H & Vulcan VD (1992) Vertical distribution of COS, CS2, DMS and other sulfur compounds in a loblolly pine forest. Atmos. Environ 26A: 2031–2036Google Scholar
  5. Boucher, VL & Nash III TH (1990) The role of the fruticose lichenRamalina menziesii in the annual turnover of biomass and macronutrients in a blue oak woodland. Bot. Gaz. 150: 114–118Google Scholar
  6. Brown KA & Bell JNB (1986) Vegetation — the missing sink in the global cycle of COS. Atmos. Environ. 20: 537–540Google Scholar
  7. Brown KA, Kluczewski SM & Bell JNB (1986) Metabolism of [35S]-carbonyl sulphide in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Environ. Exp. Bot. 26: 355–364Google Scholar
  8. Chengelis CP & Neal RA (1980) Studies of carbonyl sulfide toxicity: Metabolism by carbonic anhydrase. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 55: 198–202Google Scholar
  9. Chin M & Davis DD (1993) Global sources and sinks of OCS and CS2 and their distributions. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 7: 321–337Google Scholar
  10. Crutzen PJ (1976) The possible importance of COS for the sulfate layer of the stratosphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 3: 73–76Google Scholar
  11. Cullis CF & Hirschler MM (1980) Atmospheric sulfur: Natural and man-made sources. Atmos. Environ. 14: 1263–1278Google Scholar
  12. De Kok LJ, Stahl K & Rennenberg H (1989) Fluxes of atmospheric hydrogen sulphide to plant shoots. New Phytol. 112: 533–542Google Scholar
  13. De Kok LJ, Rennenberg H. & Kuiper PJC (1991) The internal resistance in spinach leaves to atmospheric H2S deposition is determined by metabolic processes. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 29: 463–470Google Scholar
  14. Fall R, Albritton DL, Fehsenfeld FC, Kuster WC & Goldan PD (1988) Laboratory studies of some environmental variables controlling sulfur emissions from plants. J. Atmos. Chem. 6: 341–362Google Scholar
  15. Fried A, Klinger LF & Erickson III DJ (1993) Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide exchange in bog microcosms. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20: 129–132Google Scholar
  16. Goldan PD, Kuster WC, Albritton DL & Fehsenfeld FC (1987) The measurement of natural sulfur emissions from soil and vegetation: three sites in the eastern United States revisited. J. Atmos. Chem 5: 439–467Google Scholar
  17. Goldan PD, Fall R, Kuster WC & Fehsenfeld FC (1988) The COS uptake of growing vegetation. A major tropospheric sink. J. Geophys. Res. 93: 14186–14192Google Scholar
  18. Guenther A, Lamb B & Westberg H (1989) US national biogenic sulfur emissions inventory. In: Saltzman ES & Cooper WJ (Eds) Biogenic Sulfur in the Environment (pp 15–30). American chemical Society, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofmann DJ (1990) Increase in the stratospheric background sulfuric acid aerosol mass in the past 10 years. Science 248: 996–1000Google Scholar
  20. Hofmann U, Hofmann R & Kesselmeier J (1992) Cryogenic trapping of reduced sulfur compounds under the influence of a NAFION dryer and cotton wadding as an oxidant scavenger. Atmos. Environ. 26: 2445–2449Google Scholar
  21. Johnson JE, Bandy AR, Thornton DC & Bates TS (1993) Measurements of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the NASA CITE-3 project: implications for the global COS budget. J. Geophys. Res. 23443–23448Google Scholar
  22. Kappen L (1988) Ecophysiological relationships in different climatic regions. In: Galun M (Ed) Handbook of Lichenology, Vol II (pp 37–100) CRC Press, Boca Raton, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Kershaw KA (1985) Physiological Ecology of Lichens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  24. Kesselmeier J (1991) Emission of sulfur compounds from vegetation and global scale extrapolation. In: Sharkey TD, Holland EA & Mooney HA (Eds) Trace Gas Emissions from plants (pp 261–265) Academic Press, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar
  25. Kesselmeier J & Merk L (1993) Exchange of carbonyl sulfide (COS) between agricultural plants and the atmosphere: Studies on the deposition of COS to peas, corn and rapeseed. Biogeochemistry 23: 47–59Google Scholar
  26. Kesselmeier J, Meixner FX, Hofmann U, Ajavon A, Leimbach St & Andreae MO (1992) Distribution of ozone over a tropical rain forest and exchange of reduced sulfur compounds between tropical tree species and the atmosphere: Investigations from the atmospheric boundary layer, at ground level and from the top of the canopy. In: Hallé F & Pascal O (Eds) Biologie d'une Canopée de Forêt équatoriale — II. Rapport de mission: Radeau des Cimes Octobre/Novembre 1991, Reserve de Campo, Cameroun (pp 247–263)Google Scholar
  27. Kesselmeier J, Meixner FX, Hofmann U, Ajavon A, Leimbach St & Andreae MO (1993) Reduced sulfur compound exchange between the atmosphere and tropical tree species in southern Cameroon. Biogeochemistry 23: 23–45Google Scholar
  28. Kesselmeier J, Merk L, Bliefernicht M & Helas G (1993) Trace gas exchange between terrestrial plants and atmosphere: Carbon dioxide, carbonyl sulfide and ammonia under the rule of compensation points. In: Slanina J, Angeletti G & Beilke S (Eds) General Assessment of biogenic emissions and deposition of nitrogen compounds, sulphur compounds and oxidants in Europe, CEC Air Pollution Research Report 47 (pp 79–88). E. Guyot, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  29. Kluczewski SM, Brown KA & Bell JNB (1985) Deposition of [34S]-carbonyl sulphide to vegetable crops. Radiat. Protect. Dosim. 11: 173–177Google Scholar
  30. Lamb JE (1977) Minireview — Plant carbonic anhydrase. Life Sci. 20: 393–406Google Scholar
  31. Lamb B, Westberg H, Allwine G, Bamesberger L & Guenther A (1987) Measurement of biogenic sulfur emissions from soils and vegetation: Application of dynamic enclosure methods with Natusch filter and GC/FPD analysis. J. Atmos. Chem. 5: 469–491Google Scholar
  32. Lange OL & Redon J (1983) Epiphytische Flechten im Bereich einer ‘Nebeloase’ (Fray Jorge). II. Ökophysiologische Charakterisierung von CO2-Gaswechsel and Wasserhaushalt. Flora 174: 245–284Google Scholar
  33. Longton RE (1988) Biology of Polar Bryophytes and Lichens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 391 ppGoogle Scholar
  34. Maren TH (1967) Carbonic anhydrase: Chemistry, physiology and inhibition. Physiol. Rev. 47: 595–781Google Scholar
  35. Mihalopoulos N, Bonsang B, Nguyen BC, Kanakidou M & Belviso S (1989) Field observations of carbonyl sulfide deficit near the ground: Possible implication of vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 23: 2159–2166Google Scholar
  36. Moser TJ, Nash III TH & Link SO (1983) Diurnal gross photosynthetic patterns and potential seasonal CO2 assimilation inCladonia stellaris andCladonia rangiferina. Can. J. Bot. 61: 642–655Google Scholar
  37. Poincelot RP (1979) Carbonic anhydrase. In: Gibbs M & Latzko E (Eds) Photosynthesis II, Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. New Series Vol 6 (pp 230–238). Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Protoschill-Krebs G & Kesselmeier J (1992) Enzymatic pathways for the metabolization of cabonyl sulphide (COS) by higher plants. Botanica Acta 105: 206–212Google Scholar
  39. Rennenberg H, Huber B, Schröder P, Stahl K, Haunold W, Georgii H-W, Slovik S & Pfanz H (1990) Emission of volatile sulfur compounds from spruce trees. Plant Physiol. 92: 968–971Google Scholar
  40. Taylor GE, McLaughlin SB, Shriner DS & Selvidge WJ (1983) The flux of sulfur-containing gases to vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 17: 789–796Google Scholar
  41. The National Atlas of Canada 5th edition (1993) Vegetation Cover. Canada Map Office, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada. MCR 4182Google Scholar
  42. Turco RP, Whitten RC, Toon OB, Pollac JB & Hamill P (1980) OCS, stratospheric aerosols and climate. Nature 283: 283–286Google Scholar
  43. Tsuzuki M & Miyachi S (1989) The function of carbonic anhydrase in aquatic photosynthesis. Aquat. Bot. 34: 85–104Google Scholar
  44. Tsuzuki M, Miyachi S & Edwards GE (1985) Localization of carbonic anhydrase in mesophyll cells of terrestrial C3 plants in relation to CO2 assimilation. Plant Cell Physiol. 26: 881–891Google Scholar
  45. Warneck P (1988) Chemistry of the National Atmosphere. In: Dmowska R & Holton JR (Eds) International Geophysics Series Vol 41 (p 492). Academic Press, San Diego, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gries
    • 1
  • T. H. NashIII
    • 1
  • J. Kesselmeier
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of BotanyArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiogeochemistryMax Planck Institute for ChemistryMainzGermany

Personalised recommendations