Skip to main content
Log in

Can males contribute to the genetic improvement of a species?

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the time evolution of finite populations, the accumulation of harmful mutations in further generations might have lead to a temporal decay in the mean fitness of the whole population. This, in turn, would reduce the population size and so lead to its extinction. The production of genetically diverse offspring, through recombination, is a powerful mechanism in order to avoid this catastrophic route. From a selfish point of view, meiotic parthenogenesis can ensure the maintenance of better genomes, while sexual reproduction presents the risk of genome dilution. In this paper, by using Monte Carlo simulations of age-structured populations, through the Penna model, I compare the evolution of populations with different repoductive regimes. It is shown that sexual reproduction with male competition can produce better results than meiotic parthenogenesis. This contradicts results recently published, but agrees with the strong evidence that nature chose sexual reproduction instead of partenogenesis for most of the higher species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. R. Redfield,Nature 369:145 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Kondrashov,Nature 336:1435 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Kondrashov and J. F. Crow,Human Mutation 2:229 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Pamilo, M. Nei, and W.-H. Li,Genet. Res. Camb. 49:135 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Muller,Mutat. Res. 1:2 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. C. Stearns,The Evolution of Sex and its Consequences (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Charlesworth,Curr. Biol. 3:466 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. M. C. de Oliveira, S. Moss de Oliveira, R. M. Zorzenon dos Santos, and D. Stauffer, preprint (1996).

  9. T. J. P. Penna,J. Stat. Phys. 78:1629 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. J. P. Penna and D. Stauffer,Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 6:233 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. T. Bernardes, Monte Carlo simulations on biological ageing, inAnnual Reviews of Computational Physics, Vol. IV, D. Stauffer, ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996), in press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. T. Bernardes,Ann. Phys. (Leipzig), in press (1996).

  13. M. R. Rose,Evolutionary Biology of Aging (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kondrashov,J. Theor. Biol. 175:583 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. T. Bernardes,Physica A, in press (1996).

  16. D. Charlesworth, M. T. Morgan, and B. Charlesworth,Genet. Res. Camb. 59:49 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. T. Bernardes,J. Phys. I (Paris)5:1501 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernardes, A.T. Can males contribute to the genetic improvement of a species?. J Stat Phys 86, 431–439 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180214

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180214

Key Words

Navigation