Skip to main content
Log in

Error estimates for the fast multipole method

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Statistical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Error estimates for algorithms based on truncations for evaluating electrostatic interactions in molecular dynamics applications are very important for several reasons. For example, the estimates are necessary to establish the validity of the simulations and can be used to estimate various simulation parameters. Very precise estimates have been found for the Ewald method and the related particle mesh Ewald method. However, for the very popular fast multipole method such a precise estimate is not available. In this paper, we illustrate the rather complicated error behavior of the fast multipole method and we use statistical methods to derive an estimate for the root mean square error on the forces. Furthermore, the expected maximum error on the force acting on a single particle is studied. The estimates are tested against errors obtained from simulations and are found to be very precise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. QUANTA Parameter Handbook, Polygen Corporation (1990).

  2. M. P. Allen and D J. Tildesley,Computer Simulations of Liquids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen, Particle mesh Ewald: Ann log(n) method for Ewald sums in large systems,J. Chem. Phys. 98:10089–10092 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. W. de Leeuw, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants,Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 373:27–56 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Esselink, Large-scale simulations of many-particle systems, Ph.D. thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik,Table of Integrals, Series and Products 5th ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, A fast algorithm for particle simulations,J. Comp. Phys. 73:325–348 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. L. Greengard, The rapid evaluation of potential fields in particle systems, Ph.D. thesis, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Leathrum, Jr.: Parallelization of the fast multipole algorithm: algorithm and architecture design, Ph.D. thesis, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kolafa and J. W. Perram, Cutoff errors in the Ewald summation formulae for point charge systems,Mol. Simul. 9:351–368 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. G. Petersen, D. Sølvason, J. W. Perram, and E. R. Smith, The very fast multipole method,J. Chem. Phys. 101(10):8870 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. G. Petersen, Accuracy and efficiency of the particle mesh Ewald method,J. Chem. Phys. 103(9):3668–3679 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. G. Petersen, E. R. Smith, and D. Sølvason, Error estimates for the fast multipole method. II. The three-dimensional case.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 448:401–418 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sølvason, D., Petersen, H.G. Error estimates for the fast multipole method. J Stat Phys 86, 391–420 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180212

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02180212

Key Words

Navigation