The Journal of Technology Transfer

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 21–29 | Cite as

Relationships between characteristics of teachers and teachers' assessments of sources of information

  • Francis A. Baran
  • W. C. WolfJr.


The Researchers' primary purpose was to explore relationships between (a) urban area secondary school teachers' assessments of thirty three sources of information apt to influence their practice and (b) specific characteristics of these teachers. A sample of 245 teachers, or 61% of the set contacted, participated. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of data offered by the respondents were carried out.

Both predictable and perplexing outcomes of the data analyses were documented. The Researchers concluded: a) That demographic profiles of teachers can be discerned which are related to assessments of various information sources; and b) that teachers' needs for information can be linked to preferred sources of information. They were unable to explain why variables like years of teaching experience, sex, and age were related significantly to teachers' assessments of sources of information.


Data Analysis Urban Area Economic Growth Quantitative Analysis Information Source 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bermon, Paul, “Educational Change: An Implementation Paradigm,”Improving Schools: Using What We Know (edited by Rolf Lehming and Michael Kane). Beverly Hills-London: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
  2. Brickley, Richard and Carolyn Trohoski, “The Evaluation of Educational Information Centers,” Princeton, N.J.: ERIC Clearinghouse on Tests, Measurement and Evaluation, 1974. ED 009424.Google Scholar
  3. Fry, Bernard M., “Evaluation Study of ERIC Products and Services. Final Report,” Washington, D.C.: National Center for Educational Communication, 1972. ED 060922.Google Scholar
  4. Fullan, Michael. “Overview of the Innovation Process and the User,”Interchange, Vol. 3, 1972, pp 1–46.Google Scholar
  5. Hood, Paul, “Indicators of Educational Knowledge Production, Dissemination and Utilization: A Conceptual Framework,” San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development, 1979. ED 174242.Google Scholar
  6. Louis, Karen Seashore, “Dissemination of Information From Centralized Bureaucracies to Local Schools: The Role of the Linking Agent,”Human Relations, 1977, 30, 25–42.Google Scholar
  7. Magisos, J. H., “Interpretation of Target Audience Needs in the Design of Information Dissemination Systems for Vocational-Technical Education,” Columbus, Ohio: Center for Vocational and Technical Education, Ohio State University, 1971. ED 061417.Google Scholar
  8. Mann, Dale, “The Politics of Training Teachers in Schools,”Teachers College Record, Vol. 77, 1976, pp. 323–338.Google Scholar
  9. Mann, Dale, “The User Driven System and a Modest Proposal,”Teachers College Record, Vol. 79, 1978, pp. 389–412.Google Scholar
  10. Miles, M.B., “Mapping the Common Properties of Schools,”Improving Schools: Using What We Know (edited by Rolf Lehming and Michael Kane). Beverly Hills-London: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar
  11. Seiber, Sam D., “Knowledge Utilization in Public Education: Incentives and Disincentives,”Improving Schools: Using What We Know, Beverly Hills-London: Sage Publications, 1981.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Technology Transfer Society 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francis A. Baran
    • 1
  • W. C. WolfJr.
    • 2
  1. 1.Valley Regional High SchoolDeep River
  2. 2.University of MassachusettsAmherst

Personalised recommendations