Summary
Thus we have determined that dapsone, under a variety of conditions, failed to inhibit eitherin vitro orex vivo — both classical and alternative pathway complement activation. Other mechanisms must explain dapsone's therapeutic effect on inflammation, both in man and in animals. The failure to detect anti-complement effects of suramin and sodium aurothiomalateex vivo shed doubt on the relevance of anti-complement activity identifiedin vitro.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L.E. Milikan andF.R. Conway,Effect of drugs on the Pillemer Pathway — Dapsone, J. invest. Derm.62, 441 (1974).
D.K. Gemmell, J. Cottney andA.J. Lewis,Comparative effects of drugs on four paw oedema models, Agents and Actions9, 107–116 (1979).
H. Van Dijk, P.M. Rademaker andJ.M.N. Willers,Determination of alternative pathway of complement activity in mouse serum using rabbit erythrocytes, J. Immunol. Methods36, 29–39 (1980).
J.A. Brockman andN. Bauman,A capillary diffusion method for determining haemolytic activity in undiluted serum, J. Immunol. Methods27, 353–361 (1979).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Drummond, L., Gemmell, D.K. The effect of dapsone on complement activation. Agents and Actions 13, 435–437 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02176410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02176410