Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Designing and implementing effective in-school alternatives to suspension

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Children Out of School in Ohio, by The Citizens' Council for the Ohio Schools, 1977. (Available for $2.00 from the Citizens' Council/517 The Arcade/Cleveland, Ohio 44114)

  2. Close-Out Report of the Special Student Concerns Project Bureau of Technical Assistance/ Louisiana State Department of Education, prepared by Eugene Limar and Lynda Wright, November, 1976-March, 1978.

  3. Community Opportunities for Educational Directions Project, of the North Carolina Human Relations Council, August 31, 1977. (Available free of Charge from Department of Administration/Human Relations Council/116 W. Jones Street/Raleigh, NC 27603)

  4. The Governor's Task Force on Disrupted Youth, Phase I Report, September 14, 1973, Task Force, State Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida.

  5. Project Student Concerns Interim Report of the Jefferson County Education Consortium, Louisville, Kentucky. September 14, 1977.

  6. 6.Rates, Reasons, Recommendations, a study of student suspensions by the South Carolina Human Affairs Commission, June, 1976. Linda Jones, Project Coordinator.

  7. School Suspensions Are They Helping Children? published by the Children's Defense Fund, 1520 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20036. September, 1975.

  8. Title VII Special Student Concerns Interim Report of the Louisiana State Department of Education, Bureau of Technical Assistance, Eugene Limar, Coordinator. November, 1976.

  9. Creative Discipline, by the Southeastern Public Education Program of the American Friends Service Committee, 1977–1978. (Available for $7.00 from AFSC-SEPEP, 401 Columbia Building, Columbia, SC 29201)

  10. Morgan v. Kerrigan (Available from the Chidren's Defense Fund, 15200 New Hampshire Ave. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20036)

  11. Model Code of Student Rights and Responsibilities (Available from the Center for Law and Education, 6 Appian Way, Cambridge, MA 02138)

  12. Wiles, D. K., and Rockoff, E. In-school suspension practices and the prison hospital experience.NOLPE School Law Journal, 1977, 7(1). (Available for $2.50 from NOLPE, 5401 S.W. 7th Ave., Topeka, KA 66606)

Download references

Authors

Additional information

M. Hayes Mizell is Associate Director, Southeastern Public Education Program, American Friends Service Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hayes Mizell, M. Designing and implementing effective in-school alternatives to suspension. Urban Rev 10, 213–226 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02174225

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02174225

Navigation