Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching children to read: An argument for television

  • Published:
The Urban Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Report of A.C. Neilson & Co. to Children's Television Workshop, 1974

  2. Parker, H. “The beholder's share and the problems of literacy.” InMedia and Symbols: The Forms of Expression, Communication and Education. Part I, 73rd Yearbook, NSSE, Chicago: U. of Chicago Press, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Postman, Neil.The Soft Revolution. New York:

  4. Ball, S. & Bogatz, G.AReading with television: An evaluation of “The Electric Company.” Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ball, S. & Bogatz, G.AReading with television: An evaluation of “The Electric Company.” Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gleitman, L. & Rozin, P. Teaching reading by use of a syllabary.Reading Research Quarterly., 1973,8, 447–483.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Savin, D. “What the child knows about speech when he starts to learn to read.” In Kavanaugh, J. and Mattingly, I.Language by Ear and By Eye: The Relationships Between Speech and Reading. Cambridge: MIT, 1972, 319–326.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Downing, J.A. summary of evidence related to the cognitive clarity theory of reading. National Reading Conference New Orleans, La. 1972.

  9. Mattingly, I.G. “Reading, the linguistic process and linguistic awareness,” In J.F. Kavanaugh & I.G. Mattingly, (Eds.)Language by Ear and by Eye: The Relationships Between Speech and Reading.

  10. Arnheim, R. “Virtues and vices of the usual media.”Media and Symbols: 180–210.

  11. Palmer, C. “Cartoons in the classroom.”Hollywood Quarterly III (L.) 1947 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Salomon, G. “Can we effect cognitive skills through visual media? An hypothesis and initial findings.”A-V Communications Review. 20 (4), 1972.

  13. Salomon, G. “What is learned and how it is taught: The interaction between media, message, task and learner.”Media and Symbols: 383–406.

  14. Berlyne, D.Conflict, Arousal and Curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chall, J.Learning to Read: The Great Debate. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Barbara R. Fowles is an assistant professor of psychology at Fordham University and a director of research at the Children's Television Workshop, which produces The Electric Company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowles, B.R. Teaching children to read: An argument for television. Urban Rev 9, 114–120 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173514

Navigation