Advertisement

Systems practice

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 653–670 | Cite as

A critique of hierarchy theory

  • Jennifer Wilby
Papers

Abstract

In our zeal to apply models successfully, failures of the model are often overlooked. A model may be used for quite some time before its success is questioned or before the model fails to be applied successfully. Since hierarchy theory has been deemed successful in the systems field, it is necessary and appropriate to critique the development and application of hierarchy theory using the framework presented inCreative Problem Solving (Flood and Jackson, 1992). That framework proposes a critique that uses the four areas of theory, utility, ideology, and methodology in reviewing a systems theory. It is important to examine hierarchy theory through the analytical filter of critical systems thinking if we are genuinely to understand what hierarchy theory has to offer systems thinking in the exploration of complex situations.

Key words

hierarchy critical systems thinking critique 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, T. F. H. (1985).A Primer on Hierarchy Theory, Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. F. H., and Starr, T. B. (1982).Hierarchy: Perspective for Ecological Complexity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Beer, S. (1979).The Heart of the Enterprise, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  4. Beer, S. (1981).The Brain of the Firm, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  5. Beer, S. (1985).Diagnosing the System for Organizations, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  6. Boulding, K. (1956). General systems theory: The skeleton of science.Manage. Sci. 2, 197–208.Google Scholar
  7. Boulding, K. (1961).The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  8. Bunge, M. (1963). Levels. InThe Myth of Simplicity: Problems of Scientific Philosophy, Prentice-Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bunge, M. (1969). The metaphysics, epistemology and methodology of levels. In White, L. L., Wilson, A. G., and Wilson, D. (eds.),Hierarchical Structures, American Elsevier, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Checkland, P. (1981).Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Churchman, C. W. (1982).Thought and Wisdom, Intersystems, Seaside, CA.Google Scholar
  12. Clemson, B. (1984).Cybernetics: A New Management Tool, Abacus Press, Tunbridge Wells.Google Scholar
  13. Flood, R. L. (1990).Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1993).Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science, 2nd ed., Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991).Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1992).Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Grene, M. (1967). Biology and the problems of reality.New Scholast.41, 427–449.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1972).Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, M. C. (1985). Systems inquiring competence and organizational analysis.Proceedings of the 1985 Meeting of the Society for General Systems Research, pp. 522–530.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, M. C. (1990). Beyond a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 41, 657–668.Google Scholar
  21. Jackson, M. C. (1991). The origins and nature of critical systems thinking.Syst. Pract. 4, 131–149.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, M. C. and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies.J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473–486.Google Scholar
  23. Klir, G. (1985). Complexity: Some general observations.Syst. Res. 2, 131–140.Google Scholar
  24. Lazlo, E. (1972).The Systems View of the World, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Mannermaa, M. (1988). Complexity and systems thinking in futures research: From neutral scenarios to value considerations.Syst. Pract. 1, 279–294.Google Scholar
  26. Miller, J. G. (1978).Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, J. G. (1992). Greater than the sum of its parts. 1. Subsystems which possess both matterenergy and information.Behav. Sci. 37, 1–9.Google Scholar
  28. O'Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. F. H. (1986).An Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  29. Pattee, H. H. (1973).Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Reckmeyer, W. J. (1982).The Emerging Systems Paradigm: An Historical Perspective, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  31. Salthe, S. N. (1985).Evolving Hierarchical Systems: Their Structure and Representation, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Schecter, D. (1991). Interview, May 24.Google Scholar
  33. Simon, H. A. (1973). The organization of complex systems. In Pattee, H. H. (ed.),Hierarchy Theory: The Challenge of Complex Systems, Braziller, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Troncale, L. R. (1985). Unpublished data from the Integration-Directed Iterative Dialogue, California State University, Pomona.Google Scholar
  35. Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity.Am. Sci. 36, 536–544.Google Scholar
  36. Weinberg, G. M. (1975).An Introduction to General Systems Thinking, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Weiss, P., Buechner, H. K., Coleman, J. S., Forrester, J. W., Lorenz, K., McNeill, D., and Ozbekhan, H. (1971).Hierarchically Organized Systems in Theory and Practice, Hafner, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Wilby
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Systems Studies, Newlands HouseUniversity of HullHullUK

Personalised recommendations