Advertisement

Systems practice

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 27–47 | Cite as

Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning

  • Edgar H. Schein
Papers

Abstract

This paper discusses some of Lewin's basic dictums and their influence in the author's work and that of others. Specifically, the paper expands on Lewin's change model. It also discusses process consultation and clinical research and describes a design to teach the management of planned change. The paper concludes that planned change might be better conceptualized as managed learning.

Key words

Lewin's change theory field classroom managed learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1990),Overcoming Organizational Defenses, Allyn & Bacon, Boston.Google Scholar
  2. Bettelheim, B. (1943). Individual and mass behavior in extreme situations.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 38, 417–452.Google Scholar
  3. Bohm, D. (1989).On Dialogue, Ojai Seminars, Ojai, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Bushe, G., and Pitman, T. (1991). Appreciative process: A method for transformational change.OD Pract. Sept., 1–4.Google Scholar
  5. Cooperrider, D., and Srivastava, S. (1987). Appreciative inquiry. In Woodman, R. W., and Pasmore, W. A. (eds.),Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 1, JAI Press, New York, pp. 129–169.Google Scholar
  6. Goffman, E. (1959).The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Goffman, E. (1967).Interaction Ritual, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Hirschhorn, L. (1988).The Workplace Within, MIT press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  9. Isaacs, W. N. (1993). Taking flight: Dialogue, collective thinking, and organizational learning.Organiz. Dynam. Winter, 24–39.Google Scholar
  10. Michael, D. N. (1973).On Learning to Plan and Planning to Learn, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  11. Michael, D. N. (1992). Governing by learning in an information society. In Rosell, S. A. (ed.),Governing in an Information Society, Institute for Research on Public Policy, Montreal, Quebec.Google Scholar
  12. Schein, E. H. (1956). The Chinese indoctrination program for prisoners of war.Psychiatry 19, 149–172.Google Scholar
  13. Schein, E. H., with Schneier, I., and Barker, C. H. (1961).Coercive Persuasion, Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Schein, E. H. (1968). Personal change through interpersonal relationships. In Bennis, W. G., Schein, E. H., Steele, F. I., and Berlew, D. E. (eds.),Interpersopnal Dynamics, rev. ed., Dosey Press, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  15. Schein, E. H. (1987).Process Consultation, Vol. 2, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Schein, E. H. (1988).Process Consultation, Vol. 1, rev. ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Schein, E. H. (1992).Organizational Culture and Leadership, 2nd ed., Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  18. Schein, E. H. (1993a). How can organizations learn faster? The challenge of entering the green room.Sloan Manage. Rev. 34, 85–92.Google Scholar
  19. Schein, E. H. (1993b). On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning.Organiz. Dynam. Winter, 40–51.Google Scholar
  20. Senge, P. (1990).The Fifth Discipline, Doubleday, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Van Maanen, J., and Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In Staw, M. B., and Cummings, L. L. (eds.),Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edgar H. Schein
    • 1
  1. 1.MIT Sloan School of ManagementCambridge

Personalised recommendations