Skip to main content
Log in

The ‘gatekeeper’ hypothesis and the international transfer of scientific knowledge

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with the question of problem selection by scientists, in particular scientists residing and working in small national communities. Do such scientists take their cue from the immediate environment and accept as their task the application of knowledge to national development? Or do they consider themselves members of an international scientific fraternity and adopt the problems defined by the leading luminaries at the major centers? The data presented here were collected in one small scientific community, that of the Republic of Ireland. We conclude that an Irish scientist's integration with foreign colleagues (and presumably his willingness to accept their influence) is a function of (1) the relevance of his/her work to the Irish economy i.e. the existence or non-existence of local rewards, and (2) the state of paradigm development in his/her field. If work on national problems is rewarded, then this alone can be expected to wean a scientist away from excessive reliance on foreign colleagues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Thomas J. 1966Managing the Flow of Scientific and Technological Information. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J. 1967 “Communications in the Research and Development Laboratory”,Technology Review. 70 (1):31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J. 1969Meeting the Technical Information Needs of Research and Development Projects. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Working Paper No. 431-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J. 1969(b)Roles in Technical Communication Networks. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Working Paper No. 434-69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J. and Stephen J. Cohen 1969 “Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories”,Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Thomas J., James M. Piepmeier and Sean Cooney 1971 “The International Gatekeeper”,Technology Review, 73 (5), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Marshall 1970 “Factors Affecting the Diffusion of Innovations Among Health Professionals”,American Journal of Public Health. 60 (2), 294–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James, Elihu Katz and Herbert MenzelMedical Innovation: A Diffusion Study, Bobbs-Merrill: New York.

  • Crane, Diana 1969 “Social Structure in a Group of Scientists: A Test of the ‘Invisible College’ Hypothesis”,American Sociological Review, 34, 335–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, Diana 1972Invisible Colleges: Diffusion of Knowledge in Scientific Communities University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farris, George 1971Colleague Roles and Innovation in Scientific Teams Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Working Paper No. 552-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstberger, Peter 1971The Preservation and Transfer of Technology in Research and Development Organizations. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, Warren 1965The Scientific Community. Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Arnold 1975Colleague Networks, Institutional Roles and the International Transfer of Scientific Knowledge: The Case of Ireland. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Elihu and Paul Lazarsfeld 1955Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. The Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Daniel and Robert Kahn 1966The Social Psychology of Organizations. John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, William 1972 Unpublished M.S. thesis. Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  • Menzel, Herbert 1962 “Planned and Unplanned Scientific Communication”, in Bernard Barber and Walter Hirsch (eds.),The Sociology of Science. The Free Press: New York, 417–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert 1962 “Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science”, in Bernard Barber and Walter Hirsch (eds.),The Sociology of Science. The Free Press: New York, 447–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Council, Royal Irish Academy 1971Register of Scientific Research Personel Stationary Office: Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek de Solla 1963Little Science, Big Science Columbia University Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek de Solla 1970 “Citation Measures of Hard Science, Soft Science, Technology and Nonscience”, in C. Nelson and D. Pollack (eds),Communication Among Scientists and Engineers. D. C. Heath: Lexington, Mass., 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, George W. and William G. Cochran 1967Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press: Ames, Iowa, 6th Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer, Norman 1966The Social System of Science. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herzog, A.J. The ‘gatekeeper’ hypothesis and the international transfer of scientific knowledge. J Technol Transfer 6, 57–72 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173260

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173260

Keywords

Navigation