Skip to main content
Log in

Sex differences in observers' reactions to a nurse's use of touch

  • Published:
Journal of Nonverbal Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested the notion that male and female observers would have different reactions to the use of touch by a nurse towards a patient in a hospital situation. If males are socialized to favor autonomy and independence and females to favor nurturance and caring, it was assumed that male subjects would rate a nurse as less supportive and competent if a nurse touched a patient. The results (based on reactions to photographs manipulating the level of physical contact that occurred between a nurse and a patient) were generally consistent with these predictions. While the subjects' sex moderated reactions to the nurse-initiated touch, there was an overall pattern for observers to react more favorably to the nurse who used touch compared to no touch in interacting with a patient. The results suggest that nurses and health professionals who use touch in interacting with patients may be judged in part by the attitudes of males and females about the use of touch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barak, A., & LaCrosse, M. B. (1975). Multidimensional perception of counselor behavior.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 22, 471–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Jr., Sandler, I. N., & Ramsay, T. B. (1981). Preliminary development of a scale of social support: Studies on college students.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredfeldt, R. C., Ripani, A., & Cuddeback, G. L. (1987). The effect of touch on patients' estimates of time in the waiting and examination rooms.Family Medicine, 19, 299–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Augustinis, J., Isani, R. S., Kumler, F. R. (1963). Ward study: The meaning of touch in interpersonal communication. In S. F. Burd and M. A. Marshall (Eds.),Some clinical approaches to psychiatric nursing (pp. 271–306). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. E. (1990). Gender and relationships: A developmental account.American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, J. A. (1991). Commentary.Western Journal of Nursing Research, 13, 321 -322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. H., Habermann-Little, B., Johnson, F., Vanlnwegen-Scott, D., & Tyler, D. (1985). Critically ill children: The importance of touch in a high-technology environment.Nursing Administration Quarterly, 9, 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, J. S., Megenity, J. S., Cannon, R. B., Chance, K. S., Cannella, K. S., Garland, L. M., & Gilead, M. P. (1991). Patients' perceptions of nurses' use of touch.Western Journal of Nursing Research, 13, 306–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penny, K. S. (1979). Postpartum perceptions of touch received during labor.Research in Nursing and Health, 2, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reite, M. (1990). Touch, attachment, and health: Is there a relationship? In K. E. Barnard & T. B. Brazelton (Eds.),Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 195–225). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, D. S., & Hall, J. A. (1984). Gender differences in touch: An empirical and theoretical review.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 440–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suomi, S. J. (1990). The role of tactile contact in rhesus monkey social development. In K. E. Barnard and T. B. Brazelton (Eds.),Touch: The foundation of experience (pp. 129–164). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. H., Jr., & Pleck, J. H. (1987). The structure of male role norms. In M. S. Kimmel (Ed.),Changing men: New directions in research on men and masculinity (pp. 25–36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. J. (1979). The language of touch.Nursing Research, 28, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. J. (1986). Psychophysiologic effects of caregiver touch on incidence of cardiac dysrhythmia.Heart & Lung, 15, 495–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. J. (1988). Touch. In J. J. Fitzpatrick, R. L. Taunton, & J. Q. Benoliel (Eds.),Annual review of nursing research (Vol. 6, pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. J. (1990). Effects of differential touch on nervous system arousal of patients recovering from cardiac disease.Heart & Lung, 19, 474–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitcher, S. J., & Fisher, J. D. (1979). Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, R.J., Derlega, V.J., Nichols, B. et al. Sex differences in observers' reactions to a nurse's use of touch. J Nonverbal Behav 19, 101–113 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173169

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02173169

Keywords

Navigation