Conclusion
As recently as 1970, total state and federal aid per capita for education was $65 for the CC and $83 for OCC areas (Colman, 1975, p. 169). Rather than helping to offset the significant cost disadvantages confronting cities, such aid actually contributed to the problem. As the plight of cities and their schools has surfaced, state and federal governments have responded with significant amounts of aid. While much has already been accomplished, a great deal still needs to be done. As long as cities continue to be the home of the poor and disadvantaged, equal educational opportunity requires that urban school systems spend considerably more per pupil than the surrounding suburban areas. While the question of just how much more should be spent on urban pupils is beyond the scope of this paper, in light of the special problems facing city schools, it is safe to assume that the difference noted in Table 6 will not be effective in securing equal educational opportunities for urban pupils. It is also true that although state aid has increased substantially since 1970, in many cases these increases have barely kept pace with diminishing local revenues. The differences found in Table 14 must increase if city school districts are to meet the challenge of providing quality education to their citizens.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference notes
Bothwell, R. O.Urban adjustments instate school finance systems. Draft, January 1976.
Ohio Education Association data, 1976.
Callahan, J. J., Sacks, S. S., Wilken, W., & Edwards, R.Big city schools: 1970–1975 — A profile of changing fiscal pressures. Unpublished paper, September 1977.
Ogawa, R.The equalizing effects of federal aid to education in selected school districts in the state of Ohio. Unpublished paper, Columbus, Ohio, January 1978.
References
Alkin, M. C. Revenues for education in metropolitan areas. In R. Havighurst (Ed.),Metropolitanism: its challenge to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968.
Benson, C. S.The economics of public education (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968.
Berke, J., & Kirst, M.Federal aid to education: Who benefits? Who governs? Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1972.
Coleman, J.Community conflict. New York: Free Press, 1957.
Colman, W. G.Cities, suburbs, and states. New York: Free Press, 1975.
Humel, R. C., & Nagle, J. M.Urban education in America: Problems and prospects. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.
Maxwell, J. A., & Aronson, J. R.Financing state and local government (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1977.
Meranto, P.The politics of federal aid to education in 1965. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1972.
Oakland, W.Fiscal relief for troubled cities. Columbus, OH: The Academy for Contemporary Problems, 1978.
Peterson, G. E. Finance, In W. Gorham and N. Glazer (Eds.),The urban predicament Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute, 1976.
The Potomac Institute.Equity for cities in school finance reform. Washington, D.C.: The Potomac Institute, Inc., 1973.
Riles, W. C.The urban education task force report: Final report of the Task Force on Urban Education to the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. New York: Praeger, 1970.
Sacks, S.City schools/suburban schools: A history of fiscal conflict. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1972.
Additional information
Joseph F. Murphy is a doctoral student in the Department of Educational Administration at the Ohio State University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, J.F. Fiscal problems of big city school systems: Changing patterns of state and federal aid. Urban Rev 10, 251–265 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172410