Facilitated communication: The effects of facilitator knowledge and level of assistance on output

  • Marcia Datlow Smith
  • Pamela J. Haas
  • Ronald G. Belcher
Article

Abstract

Investigated facilitated communication with 10 adults with autism, and specifically examined the effects of facilitator influence and level of assistance as a function of facilitator knowledge of experimental stimuli. Six men and four women with autism served as subjects, ranging in age from 14 years to 51 years of age. Each subject had 6 experimental sessions, 2 with no help, 2 with partial assistance, and 2 with full assistance. Within each session, the facilitator had knowledge of the experimental stimuli in one half of the trials. Results revealed no cases of correct responding independent of facilitator knowledge of correct answers. Additionally, facilitator control was apparent in numerous cases in which typed output matched stimuli to which the facilitator, not the subject, had been exposed. Results suggest that clinical and educational use of the procedure should be curtailed pending further experimental investigation.

Keywords

Experimental Investigation Correct Answer School Psychology Experimental Session Numerous Case 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed., rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  2. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis.Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291–314.Google Scholar
  3. Biklen, D. (1992). Typing to talk: Facilitated communication.American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1(2), 15–17.Google Scholar
  4. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Gold, D., Berrigan, C., & Swaminathan, S. (1992). Facilitated communication: Implications for individuals with autism.Topics in Language Disorders, 12(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
  5. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Saha, S. N., Duncan, J., Gold, D., Hardardottir, M., Karna, E., O'Connor, S., & Rao, S. (1991). “I amn not a utistivc on thje typ” (“I'm not autistic on the typewriter”).Disability, Handicap & Society, 6(3), 161–180.Google Scholar
  6. Biklen, D., & Schubert, A. (1991). New words: The communication of students with autism.Remedial and Special Education, 12(6), 46–57.Google Scholar
  7. Crossley, R. (1988, October).Unexpected communication attainments by persons diagnosed as autistic and intellectually impaired. Unpublished paper presented at International Society for Augmentative and Alternative Communication, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992). Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training.Topics in Language Disorders, 12(4), 29–45.Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, R. A., & Prior, M. P. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A response to Biklen.Harvard Educational Review, 62, 428–256.Google Scholar
  10. Dimon-Borowski, M. (1992). Facilitated communication workshop.New directions in communication. Conference sponsored by Community Services for Autistic Adults and Children, Chevy Chase, MD.Google Scholar
  11. Donnellan, A. M., Sabin, L. A., & Majure, L. A. (1992). Facilitated communication: Beyond the quandary to the questions.Topics in Language Disorders, 12(4), 69–82.Google Scholar
  12. Hudson, A., Melita, B., & Arnold, N. (1993). Brief report: A case study assessment of facilitated communication.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 165–173.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith, M. D. (1992, Winter). CSAAC interview: Dr. Douglas Biklen.Community News: The Newsletter of Community Services for Autistic Adults and Children, Inc., pp. 1–2, 4.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, M. D., & Belcher, R. G. (1993). Brief report: Facilitated communication with adults with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 23, 175–183.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Szempruch, J., & Jacobson, J. W. (1992, October).Evaluating facilitated communication of people with developmental disabilities (Tech. Rep. No. 92-TA2). Rome, NY: Community Services, Rome Developmental disabilities Services Office, New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar
  16. Wheeler, D. L., Jacobson, J. W., Paglieri, R. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1993). An experimental assessment of facilitated communication.Mental Retardation, 31, 49–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcia Datlow Smith
    • 1
  • Pamela J. Haas
    • 1
  • Ronald G. Belcher
    • 1
  1. 1.Community Services for Autistic Adults and ChildrenRockville

Personalised recommendations