Advertisement

Assessing the functions of aberrant behaviors: A review of psychometric instruments

  • Peter Sturmey
Article

Abstract

Reviewed the psychometric properties, treatment utility, and conceptual basis of psychometric instruments used to identify the functions of aberrant behaviors in people with developmental disabilities. The instruments reviewed are the Motivational Assessment Scale (Durand & Crimmins, 1992), the Motivation Analysis Rating Scale (Weisheler, Hanson, Chamberlain, & Thompson, 1985), the Functional Analysis Interview Form (O'Neill, Horner, Albin, Storey, & Sprague, 1990), and the Functional Analysis Checklist (Van Houten & Rolider, 1991). Recurrent problems in this area include the lack of replicability of the reliability of these instruments, difficulties in summarizing the information from these assessment devices, difficulties in translating the assessment into treatment packages, strong individual differences in the functions of behavior problems, and, finally, issues relating to the concurrent validity, both across these instruments and across other assessment methods.

Keywords

Behavior Problem Functional Analysis Psychometric Property School Psychology Concurrent Validity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf M. M., & Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.Google Scholar
  2. Bihm, E. M., Kienlen, T. L., Ness, M. E., & Poindexter, A. R. (1991). Factor structure of the Motivational Assessment Scale for persons with mental retardation.Psychological Reports, 68, 1235–1238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Carr, E. G. (1977). The motivation of self-injurious behavior: a review of some hypotheses.Psychological Bulletin, 84, 800–816.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Crawford, J., Brockel, B., Schauss, S., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1992). A comparison of methods for the functional assessment of stereotyped behavior in persons with mental retardation.Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 77–86.Google Scholar
  5. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1988). Identifying the variables maintaining self-injurious behavior.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 18, 99–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Durand, V. M., & Crimmins, D. B. (1992).The Motivation Assessment Scale (MAS) administration guide. Topeka, KS: Monaco & Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Durand, V. M., Crimmins, D. B., Caulfield, M., & Taylor, J. (1989). Reinforcer assessment I: Using problem behaviors to select reinforcers.Journal of the Association of Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14, 113–126.Google Scholar
  8. Goza, A. B., & Ricketts, R. W. (1993, May).The Motivational Assessment Scale: Analysis of inter-rater and test-retest reliability. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis-International, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1982). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20.Google Scholar
  10. Iwata, B. A., Vollmar, T. R., & Zarcone, J. R. (1990). The experimental (functional) analysis of behavior disorders. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh. (Eds.),Perspectives on the use of aversive and non aversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
  11. Kearney, C. A., & Silverman, W. K. (1990). A preliminary analysis of a functional analysis model of school refusal behavior.Behavior Modification, 14, 340–366.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Newton T., & Sturmey, P. (1991). The Motivation Assessment Scale: Inter-rater reliability and internal consistency in a British sample.Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 35, 372–374.Google Scholar
  13. Oliver, C. (1991). The application of analogue methodology to the functional analysis of challenging behavior. In B. Remington (Ed.),The challenge of severe mental handicap. A behavior analytic approach (pp. 97–117). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. O'Neill, R. E., Horner, R. H., Albin, R. W., Storey, K., & Sprague, J. R. (1990).Functional analysis of problem behavior. A practical assessment guide. Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
  15. Pyles, D. A., & Bailey, J. S. (1990). Diagnosing severe behavior problems. In A. C. Repp & N. N. Singh. (Eds.),Perspectives on the use of aversive and nonaversive interventions for persons with developmental disabilities (pp. 301–330). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore.Google Scholar
  16. Repp, A. C., Felce, D., & Barton, L. E. (1988). Basing treatment of stereotypic and self-injurious behaviors on hypotheses of their causes.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 281–289.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, N. N., Donatelli, L. S., Best, A., Williams, E. E., Barrera, F. J., Lenz, M. W., Landrum, T. J., Ellis, C. R., & Moe, T. L. (1993). Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale.Journal of Intellectual Disabilities Research, 37, 65–73.Google Scholar
  18. Sturmey, P. (1991). Assessing challenging behavior using semi-structured behavioral interviews: A case transcript.Mental Handicap, 19, 56–90.Google Scholar
  19. Sturmey, P., & Bertman, L. J. (1993, May).The Functional Analysis Checklist: Interrater and test-retest reliability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis-International, Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Sturmey, P., Woods, D., & Crisp, A. G. (1991). Validation of the Pethna toy through changes in collateral behaviors.Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 35, 459–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Van Houten, R., & Rolider, A. (1991). Applied behavior analysis. In J. L. Matson & J. A. Mulick (Eds.),Handbook of mental retardation (2nd ed., pp. 569–585). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  22. Wahler, R. G. (1975). Some structural aspects of deviant child behavior.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 27–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Weiseler, N. A., Hanson, R. H., Chamberlain, T. P., & Thompson, T. (1985). Functional taxonomy of stereotypic and self-injurious behavior.Mental Retardation, 23, 230–234.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Zarcone, J. R., Rodgers, T. A., Iwata, B. A., Rourke, D. A., & Dorsey, M. F. (1991). Reliability analysis of the Motivation Assessment Scale.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 349–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Sturmey
    • 1
  1. 1.Abilene State SchoolUSA

Personalised recommendations