Research has suggested that the core handicaps of autism result from a specific impairment in theory of mind (ToM). However, this account has been challenged by the finding that a minority of autistic subjects pass 1st- and even 2nd-order ToM tests while remaining socially handicapped. In the present study, able autistic subjects who failed ToM tasks, those who passed 1st-order, and those who passed 2nd-order tasks were tested with a battery of more naturalistic and complex stories. Autistic subjects were impaired at providing context-appropriate mental state explanations for the story characters' nonliteral utterances, compared to normal and mentally handicapped controls. Performance on the stories was closely related to performance on standard ToM tasks, but even those autistic subjects who passed all ToM tests showed impairments on the more naturalistic story materials relative to normal adult controls.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a ‘theory of mind’?Cognition, 21, 37–46.
Bowler, D. M. (1992). Theory of mind in Asperger's syndrome.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 877–893.
Brownell, H. H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence; sensitivity to verbal humour in right hemisphere patients.Brain and Language, 18, 20–27.
Bryan, K. L. (1988). Assessment of language disorders after right hemisphere damage.British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 23, 111–125.
Frith, U. (1989).Autism: Explaining the enigma. Oxford: Blackwell.
Frith, U., Morton, J., & Leslie, A. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: Autism.Trends in Neuroscience, 14, 433–438.
Happé, F. G. E. (1991). The autobiographical writings of three Asperger Syndrome adults: Problems of interpretation and implications for theory. In U. Frith (Ed.),Autism and Asperger syndrome. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Happé, F. G. E. (1993). Communication and theory of mind in autism: A test of relevance theory.Cognition., 48, 101–119.
Happé, F. G. E. (in preparation a). Does the autistic child ever have a theory of mind? Explaining the success of the “talented minority.”
Happé, F. G. E. (in preparation b). The homograph task: A test of weak central coherence in autism.
Hobson, R. P. (1989). Beyond cognition: A theory of autism. In G. Dawson (Ed.),Autism: Nature, diagnosis and treatment. New York: Guilford.
Hobson, R. P. (1990). On acquiring knowledge about people, and the capacity to pretend: A response to Leslie.Psychological Review, 97, 114–121.
Kaplan, J. A., Brownell, H. H., Jacobs, J. R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks.Brain and Language, 38, 315–333.
Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretence and representation: The origins of “Theory of Mind.”Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.
Leslie, A. M. (1988). Some implications of pretence for mechanisms underlying the child's theory of mind. In J. W. Astington, P. L. Harris, & D. R. Olson (Eds.),Developing Theories of Mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1988). Autistic children's understanding of seeing, knowing, and believing.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 315–324.
Ozonoff, S., Rogers, S. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1991). Asperger's syndrome: Evidence of an empirical distinction from high-functioning autism.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1107–1122.
Perner, J., Frith, U., Leslie, A. M., & Leekam, S. R. (1989). Exploration of the autistic child's theory of mind: knowledge, belief, and communication.Child Development, 60, 689–700.
Sodian, B., & Frith, U. (1992). Deception and sabotage in autistic, retarded and normal children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33, 591–605.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1989).An analysis of discourse ability and internal stale lexicons in a longitudinal study of autistic children. Paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Kansas City, MO.
Tager-Flusberg, H. (1992). Autistic children's talk about psychological states: deficits in the early acquisition of a theory of mind.Child Development, 63, 161–172.
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and the constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception.Cognition, 13, 103–128.
This work was completed while the author held an MRC studentship, and was submitted in partial fulfillment of a Ph.D. degree, University of London. I am grateful to the teachers and pupils of the following schools, for their kind assistance: Broomhayes School, Heathlands School, Helen Allison School, Sybil Elgar School, Springhallow School, Ramsden School. I also thank Fran Siddons for her help in collecting the data, and Uta Frith and all my colleagues at the CDU for invaluable discussions.
About this article
Cite this article
Happé, F.G.E. An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord 24, 129–154 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02172093
- Mental State
- School Psychology
- Normal Child
- Adult Control
- State Explanation