Zusammenfassung
Eine sachliche Gliederung der klinischen Kieferorthopädie wird vorgeschlagen. Es wird darauf hingewiesen, daß mechanisch induzierte Kräfte auf allen Teilgebieten des Faches eine bedeutende Rolle spielen.
Die von dem kieferorthopädischen Gerät entwickelte Kraft wird als Primärkraft bezeichnet, während Kräfte, die sich beim Auffangen der Primärkraft in den Geweben des Gesichtes entwickeln, Sekundärkräfte genannt werden.
Die eigentliche Gewebsreaktion wird von Sekundärkräften ausgelöst. Unterschiede und gegenseitige Beziehungen zwischen mechanische und biologische Gewebsreaktionen werden diskutiert und schematisch dargestellt.
Summary
The significance of force application in all aspects of clinical orthodontics is stressed. Experimental work is still needed to learn more about the effect of such forces on facial tissues. The increasing attention of modern orthodonties with attempts to influence facial growth and development makes this research also important to the clinician.
A distinction in primary ( — mechanically induced) force and secondary (— tissue related) force is proposed. Secondary forces are strongly related to local circumstance and tissue characteristics. Tissue reactions in facial structures are mainly initiated by secondary forces.
Differences between mechanical and biological tissue reactions, as well as their interdependence is discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Schrifttum
Bassett, C. A., und R. O. Becker, Generation of electric potentials by bone in response to mechanical stress. Science137 (1962) 1063.
Bassett, A. L., Electrical effects in bone. Scientific Amer.1965, 18–25.
Baumrind, S., A reconsideration of the propriety of the “pressure-tension” hypothesis. Amer. J. Orthodont.55 (1969) 12–22.
Bien, S. M., Flufd dynamic mechanisms which regulate tooth movement. Advanc. oral. Biol.2 (1966) 173–201.
Bjork, A., Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta odont. scand.13 (1955) 9–34.
Enlow, D. H., Principles of Bone Remodeling. Charles C. Thomas Publishers, Springfield/Ill 1963.
Enlow, D. H., A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Amer. J. Orthodont.52 (1966) 283–299.
Enlow, D. H., A comparative study of facial growth in Homo and Macaca. Amer. J. phys. Anthrop.24 (1966) 293–307.
Fränkel, R., Orthodontie, Kieferorthopädie, Funktionskieferorthopädie. Dtsch. Stomat.15 (1965) 299.
Gardner, G. E., und J. H. Kronman, Cranioskeletal displacements caused by rapid palatal expansion in the rhesus monkey. Amer. J. Orthodont.59 (1971) 146–155.
Gianelly, A. A., Force-induced changes in the vascularity of the periodontal ligament. Amer. J. Orthodont.55 (1969) 5–11.
Graber, Chung, und Aoba, Dentofacial orthopedies versus orthodontics. J. Amer. dent. Ass.75 (1967) 1145–1166.
Haas, A. J., Palatal expansion: Just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Amer. J. Orthodont.57 (1970) 219–255.
Isaacson, R. J., J. L. Wood and A. H. Ingram, Forces produced by rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthodont.34 (1964) 256–270.
Jacobs, R. M., Treatment objectives and case retention: Cybernetic and “Myometric” considerations. Amer. J. Orthodont.58 (1970) 552–564.
Korkkaus, G., Present orthodontic thought in Germany. Amer. J. Orthodont.45 (1959).
Korkhaus, G., Orthodontie oder Kieferorthopädie? Zahnärztl. Mschr. H.13 (1962).
Linge, L., A technique for the study of morphology in facial sutures under mechanical influence. Trans. Europ. Orthodont. Soc. 1970, 553–567.
Melsen, B., und H. Enemark, Effect of cervical anchorage studied by the implant method. Trans. Europ. Orthodont. Soc.1969, 435–444.
Prahl, B., Sutural Growth. Diss. der Universität Nijmegen (Holland) 1968.
Pritchard, Scott und Girgis, The structure and development of cranial and facial sutures. J. Anat. (Lond.)90 (1956) 73–86.
Reitan, K., The initial tissue reaction incident to orthodontic tooth movement as related to the influence of function. Acta odont. scand., Suppl.6 (1951).
Reitan, K., Some factors determining the evaluation of forces in orthodontics. Amer. J. Orthodont.43 (1957) 32–45.
Reitan, K., und E. Kvam, Comparative behavior of human and animal tissue during experimental tooth movement. Angle Orthodont.41 (1971) 1–14.
Ricketts, R. M., Planning treatment on the basis of the facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthodont.27 (1957) 14–37.
Ricketts, R. M., The influence of orthodontic treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthodont.30 (1960) 103–133.
Schwarz, A. M., Die lebenskundlichen (biologischen) Grundlagen der Kieferorthopädie. In: Lehrgang der Gebißregelung, Bd. II, S. 6–72. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Wien-Innsbruck 1956.
Storey, E., und R. Smith, Force in orthodontics and its relation to tooth movement. Aust. J. Dent.56 (1952) 11–18.
Stuteville, O. H., A summary review of tissue changes incident to tooth movement. Angle Orthodont.8 (1938) 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Mit 1 Abbildung
Diese Arbeit wurde teilweise von U.S.P.H.S., Grant 02272 unterstützt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linge, L. Die gewebliche Übertragung mechanisch induzierter Kräfte vom Gebiß auf das Gesicht. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 32, 483–487 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170928
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02170928