Skip to main content
Log in

The glaucoma suspect: Differentiation of the future glaucomatous eye from the non-glaucomatous suspect eye

1. Ultrasonic measurements and eye-wall stress

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined the eyes of a group of patients entered into and still continuing in a glaucoma suspect study. Over time, some remained unchanged while others developed chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG). By comparing the data obtained by ultrasonic measurement of the axial length (A) and central corneal thickness (CCT), along with measurement of intra-ocular pressure (IOP) from these patients and normal control subjects, we found no differences. However, by combining these factors in a calculation of eye-wall stress we found a significant difference between the glaucoma suspect and the future glaucomatous eye.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chisholm IA, Stead S, Tan L, Melenchuck JW (1980) Prognostic indicators in ocular hypertension. Can J Ophthalmol 7:4–8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Edmund C (1987) Determination of the corneal thickness profile by optical pachometry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 65:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ehlers N, Kruse Hansen F (1974) Central corneal thickness in low tension glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 52:740–746

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehlers N, Bramsen T, Sperling S (1975) Applanation tonometry and central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 53:34–43

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldmann H, Schmidt T (1957) Über Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologia 134:221–242

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kruse Hansen F (1971) A clinical study of the normal human central corneal thickness. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 49:82–89

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kruse Hansen F, Ehlers N (1971) Elevated tonometer readings caused by a thick cornea. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 49:775–778

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martola EL, Baum JL (1968) Central and peripheral corneal thickness. Arch Ophthalmol 79:28–30

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mishima S (1968) Corneal thickness — a review. Surv Ophthalmol 13:57–96

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rock WJ, Drance SM, Morgan RW (1973) Visual field screening in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 89:287–290

    Google Scholar 

  11. Szczudlowski K (1979) Glaucoma hypothesis: application of the law of Laplace. Med Hypotheses 5:481–486

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tomlinson A, Leighton DA (1972) Ocular dimensions in low tension glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 56:97–105

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tomlinson A, Phillips CI (1970) Applanation tension and axial length of the eyeball. Br J Ophthalmol 54:548–553

    Google Scholar 

  14. Von Bahr G (1948) Measurements of the thickness of the cornea. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 26:247–266

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yitteberg J, Dohlman CH (1965) Corneal edema and intraocular pressure: II. Clinical results. Arch Ophthalmol 74:477–484

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chisholm, I.A., Drance, S.M. & Chauhan, B.C. The glaucoma suspect: Differentiation of the future glaucomatous eye from the non-glaucomatous suspect eye. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227, 17–20 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169818

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169818

Keywords

Navigation