Skip to main content
Log in

Contrast sensitivity versus static visual field testing during experimental elevation of intraocular pressure

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity testing has been recommended as a more sensitive indicator of early visual loss than visual field testing. Using gravity inversion to induce an intraocular pressure rise, we performed contrast sensitivity testing on each eye of 10 normal subjects in the upright and inverted positions. Contrast sensitivity results were not altered in the head-down position, even though in 5 of the 10 subjects (7 of 20 eyes), visual field alterations on static perimetry were elicited during inversion. In both of these evaluations, the subject's results in the upright position served as the control, freeing us from reliance upon age-matched populations. We conclude that precise measurement of static thresholds with automated perimetry is more sensitive than routine contrast sensitivity testing in detecting visual dysfunction related to transient acute elevations of intraocular pressure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams AJ, Heron G, Husted R (1987) Clinical measures of central visual function in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 782–787

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caprioli J, Spaeth GL (1985) Static threshold examination of the peripheral nasal visual field in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 103: 1150–1154

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friberg TR, Sanborn G (1985) Optic nerve dysfunction during gravity inversion. Arch Opthalmol 103: 1687–1689

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friberg TR, Weinreb RN (1985) Ocular manifestatioans of gravity inversion. JAMA 253: 1755–1757

    Google Scholar 

  5. Linder BJ, Trick GL, Cooper DG, Applegate RA (1987) Dissociation of color vision and contrast sensitivity deficits in glaucoma suspects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci [Suppl] 28: 62

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ross JE (1985) Clinical detection of abnormalities in central vision in chronic simple glaucoma. Int Ophthalmol 8: 167–177

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ross JE, Bron AJ, Reeves BC, Emmerson PG (1985) Detection of optic nerve damage in ocular hypertension. Br J Ophthalmol 69: 897–903

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross JE, Clarke DD, Bron AJ (1985) Effect of age on contrast sensitivity function: uniocular and binocular findings. Br J Ophthalmol 69: 51–56

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sanborn GE, Friberg TR, Allen R (1987) Optic nerve dysfunction during gravity inversion. Visual field abnormalities. Arch Ophthalmol 105: 774–776

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weinreb RN, Cook J, Friberg TR (1984) Effect of inverted body position on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol 98: 784–787

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whalen WR (1985) Routine reliability parameters in Whalen WR, Spaeth GL (eds) Computerized visual fields. What they are and how to use them. Slack, New Jersey, pp 81–88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Friberg, T.R., Sanborn, G.E. & Budd, R. Contrast sensitivity versus static visual field testing during experimental elevation of intraocular pressure. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 227, 345–347 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169410

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02169410

Keywords

Navigation