Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quelques réflexions à propos des phénomènes de résonance magnétique dans le domaine des radiofréquences

  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Guided by the analogies and connexions between optical spectroscopy and radiofrequency spectroscopy, the author suggests some experiments on radiofrequency resonance phenomena. In a first part, he shows that in certain cases irradiation with light will modify the intensity of radiofrequency resonance signals, and that such an effect is particularly to be expected at low temperature and with circularly polarized light. In a second part, connexions between ultrasonic waves and magnetic resonance are examined and attention is drawn to the fact that magnetic resonance in crystals at very low temperature acts as a generator of ultrasonic waves of high frequency, those waves being detectable by study of the angular distribution of light scattered by the crystal. Finally it is emphasized that investigation of nuclear quadrupole resonance in monocrystals must reveal striking anisotropy and coherence effects and that the study of destruction of coherence by small magnetic fields provides a new method for measuring spin-spin relaxation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Physica17, 169 (1951).

  2. C. J. Gorter, Exper.4, 453 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Voir:T. M. B. Kellogg etS. Millman, Rev. Mod. Physics18, 323 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Zavoisky, J. Physics U.S.S.R.9, 211, 245, 299 (1945);10, 170, 197 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. M. Purcell, A. C. Torrey etR. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.69, 37 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev.70, 466 et 474 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Soutif, J. Physique10, 61 D (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Kastler, C. r. Acad. Sci.228, 1640 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Kastler, C. r. Acad. Sci.231, 1462 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ch. Ryter, R. Lacroix etR. Extermann, Helv. phys. acta23, 539 (1950); et Physica17, 440 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Soutif-Guicherd etM. Lambinet, C. r.231, 1460 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. F. Bitter, Phys. Rev.76, 833 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Brossel etA. Kastler, C. r.229, 1213 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Brossel, P. Sagalyn etF. Bitter, Phys. Rev.79, 225 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  15. F. Bitter etJ. Brossel, M.I.T. Technical report no 176 (12. 9. 1950).

  16. A. Kastler, J. Physique11, 255 (1950); Commun. Congrès de Spectroscopie des Radiofréquences, Amsterdam 1950, paruc dans: Physica17, 191 (1951); C. r.232, 953 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. G. N. Lewis, M. Calvin etM. Kasha, J. Chem. Physics17, 804 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. A. B. Scott, L. P. Bupp,et al., Phys. Rev.79, 341, 346 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. R. Beringer etJ. G. Castle, Phys. Rev.78, 581 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. E. E. Schneider etT. S. England, Commun. Congrès de Spectroscopie des Radiofréquences, Amsterdam 1950 (parue dans: Physica17, 191 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  21. G. N. Lewis, M. Calvin etM. Kasha, J. Chem. Physics17, 804 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. A. B. Scott, L. P. Bupp et al., Phys. Rev.79, 341 346 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Voir aussi:M. Kasha etR. V. Nauman, J. Chem. Phys.17, 516 (1949), etC. Reid, J. Chem. Phys.18, 1673 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. T. S. England etE. E. Schneider, Nature166, 437 (1950).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. F. Bitter, Phys. Rev.76, 833 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Brossel etA. Kastler, C. r.229, 1213 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Brossel, P. Sagalyn etF. Bitter, Phys. Rev.79, 225 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Bitter etJ. Brossel, M.I.T. Technical report no 176 (12. 9. 1950).

  29. A. Kastler, J. Physique11, 255 (1950); Commun. congrès de Spectroscopie des radiofréquences, Amsterdam 1950, parue dans: Physica17, 191 (1951); C. r.232, 953 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. J. Gorter,Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Benzie etA. H. Cooke, Proc. Phys. Soc. [A]63, 201 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. H. Cooke,Paramagnetic Relaxation Effects, Reports Progress Physics13, 276 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Bloch, W. W. Hansen etM. Packard, Phys. Rev.70, 474 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. N. Blombergen, E. M. Purcell etR. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.73, 679 (1948).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. N. Bloembergen, Thèse, Harvard 1948.

  36. M. Soutif, Thèse, Paris 1950.

  37. M. Soutif, J. Physique10, 61 [D] (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  38. L. Bergmann,Der Ultraschall (V. D. I.-Verlag, Berlin 1942), p. 34.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Grivet etM. Soutif m'ont informé qu'ils ont envisagé dès 1949 une influence des ondes ultra-sonores sur la résonance magnétique nucléaire et qu'ils ont projeté des expériences pour la mettre en évidence.

  40. I. Waller, Z. Physik79, 370 (1932).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. C. J. Gorter,Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  42. A. H. Cooke, Reports Progress Physics,13, 276 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Heitler etE. Teller, Proc. Roy. Soc.155, 629 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  44. M. Fierz, Physica5, 433 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. R. Kronig, Physica6, 33 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. J. H. van Vleck, Phys. Rev.57, 426 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.79, 685 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. N. Bloembergen, E. M. Purcell etR. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.73, 679 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. C. J. Gorter,Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  50. A. H. Cooke, Reports Progress Physics13, 276 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. H. B. G. Casimir etF. K. Du Pré, Physica5, 507 (1938);6, 156 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. H. B. G. Casimir etF. K. Du Pré, Physica5, 507 (1938);6, 156 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. R. J. Benzie etA. H. Cooke, Proc. Phys. Soc. [A]63, 201 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. H. C. Kramers, D. Bijl etC. J. Gorter, Physica16, 65 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev.59, 724, 730 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. A. Herpin, Thèse, Paris 1950 (à paraître dans Ann. Physique).

  57. A. Herpin, Thèse, Paris 1950 (à paraître dans Ann. Physique)

  58. J. H. Van Vleck, Phys. Rev.59, 724, 730 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. A. Rousset,La diffusion de la lumiére par les molécules rigides, chapitre II (Gauthiers-Villars, Paris, 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  60. K. W. F. Kohlrausch,Der Smekal-Raman-Effekt, Vol. I, p. 282 (Editions Springer, 1931).

  61. L. Bergmann,Der Ultraschall, chap. IV (1942).

  62. F. Rasetti, Z. Physik61, 598 (1930).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. R. S. Krishnan etV. Chandrasekharan, Ind. Acad. Sci.31, 427 (1950).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev.70, 460 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. M. Soutif, J. Physique10, 61 D (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  66. R. Freymann, J. Physique9 37 [D] (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  67. J. C. Pecker, J. Physique12, 628 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  68. W. Maier, Z. Elektrochemie54, 521 (1950) et Ergebnisse exakter Naturwissenschaften24, 275 (1951).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. R. V. Pound, Phys. Rev.79, 685 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. H. G. Dehmelt etH. Kruger, Naturwissenschaften37, 111, 398 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. H. Kopfermann, Physica17, 386 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. R. Livingston, Phys. Rev.82, 289 (1951)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. H. G. Dehmelt etH. Kruger, Z. f. Physik129, 401 (1951);130, 385 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. H. G. Dehmelt, Z. f. Physik130, 356 (1951);H. Kruger, ib.130, 371 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. J. J. van Vleck,The theory of Electric and Magnetic Susceptibilities, chap. XI, p. 73 (Oxford United Press, 1932).

  76. J. C. Gorter,Paramagnetic Relaxation (Elsevier, Amsterdam 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  77. L. J. F. Broer, Physica9, 547 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. P. R. Weiss et al., Phys. Rev.73, 470;74, 1478 (1948).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. W. Pauli, Handb. Physik, Vol. 23, Quantentheorie, Ziffer 18, voir aussi:P. Soleillet, J. Physique7, 77, 118, 173 (1936).

  80. F. Suppe, Z. Physik113, 18 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. P. Pringsheim,Fluorescence and Phosphorescence p. 98 (1949).

  82. A. Kastler etA. Rousset, Phys. Rev.71, 455 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. A. Kastler, Z. Elektrochemie54, 501 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. E. R. Andrew, J. Chem. Phys.18, 607 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. C. H. Townes etB. P. Dailey, J. Chem. Physics17, 789 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev.70, 460 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. M. Soutif, J. Physique10, 61 [D] (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  88. P. Pringsheim,Fluorescence and Phosphorescence, p. 79 (Interscience Publ., New-York 1949).

    Google Scholar 

  89. A. C. G. Mitchell etM. W. Zemansky,Resonance Radiation and Excited Atoms, chap. 5 (Cambridge United Press 1934).

  90. Yeou-Ta, C. r. Acad. Sci.209, 997 (1939).

    Google Scholar 

  91. B. Hendricks, Z. Kristallographie,84, 85 (1933).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. A. Rousset etR. Lochet, Journal de Physique3, 146 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. B. D. Saksena, J. Chem. Phys.18, 1653 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. B. Hendricks et al., J. Chem. Phys.1, 549 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. H. G. Dehmelt etH. Kruger, Naturwissenschaften37, 111, 398 (1950).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. H. Kopfermann, Physica17, 386 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. R. Livingston, Phys. Rev.82, 289 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. A. Rousset etR. Lochet, J. Physique3, 146 (1942).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. G. Becker etH. Kruger, Naturwissenschaften38, 121 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Voir aussi:H. G. Dehmelt, Z. Physik130, 356 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. F. Bloch, Phys. Rev.70, 460 (1946).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. M. Soutif, J. Physique10, 61 [D] (1949).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Physique de l'Ecole normale supérieure, Paris

    A. Kastler

Authors
  1. A. Kastler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Cet article présente le dévloppment de quelques idées exprimées par l'auteur à la Réunion internationale de spectroscopie de Bâle, 28–30 juin 1951.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kastler, A. Quelques réflexions à propos des phénomènes de résonance magnétique dans le domaine des radiofréquences. Experientia 8, 1–9 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168877

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02168877

Search

Navigation