Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 441–455 | Cite as

The significance of self-reported anxious symptoms in first-grade children

  • Nick Ialongo
  • Gail Edelsohn
  • Lisa Werthamer-Larsson
  • Lisa Crockett
  • Sheppard Kellam
Article

Abstract

It is generally believed that prior to the middle to late elementary school years children's reports of anxious symptoms represent nothing more than transient developmental phenomena. In light of the limited empirical study of this issue and its import to the allocation of mental health resources, the present study seeks to provide empirical evidence of the significance of anxious symptoms in children younger than 7. Specifically, utilizing an epidemiologically defined population of 1197 first-grade children, followed longitudinally from the fall to spring of first grade, we examine the stability, prevalence and caseness of children's self-reports of anxious symptoms. Self-reported anxious symptoms proved relatively stable over 4-month test-retest interval. In addition, they appeared to have a significant impact on academic functioning in terms of reading achievement. These findings on stability, caseness, and prevalence suggest children's self-reported anxious symptoms in the early elementary school years may have clinical significance. However, further study is necessary before firm conclusions can be drawn.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angold, A. (1988). Childhood and adolescent depression: I. Epidemiological and aetiological aspects.British Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 601–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients.Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.Google Scholar
  3. Benjamin, R. S., Costello, E. J., & Warren, M. (1990). Anxiety disorders in a pediatric sample.Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 4, 293–316.Google Scholar
  4. Beardslee, W., Klerman, G., Keller, M., Lavori, P., & Podorefsky, D. (1985). But are they cases? Validity of DSM-III major depression in children identified in a family study.American Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 687–691.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkson, J. (1946). Limitations of the application of the fourfold contingency table.Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 47–53.Google Scholar
  6. Bird, H., Canino, G., Rubio-Stipec, M., Gould, M. S., Ribera, J., Sesman, M., Woodbury, M., Huertas-Goldman, S., Pagan, A., Sanchez-Lacay, A., & Moscoso, M. (1988). Estimates of prevalence of childhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico.Archives of General Psychiatry, 45, 1120–1126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Casey, R. J. (1993). Children's emotional experience: Relations among expression, self-report, and understanding.Developmental Psychology, 29, 119–129.Google Scholar
  8. Feinberg, S. E. (1977).The analysis of cross-classified categorical data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fleming, J., Offord, D., & Boyle, M. H. (1989). The Ontario Child Health Study: Prevalence of childhood and adolescent depression in the community.British Journal of Psychiatry, 155, 647–654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kellam, S. (1990). Developmental epidemiological framework for family research on depression and aggression. In G. Patterson (Ed.),Depression and aggression in family interaction (pp. 11–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Kovacs, M. & Goldston, D. (1991). Cognitive and social cognitive development of depressed children and adolescents.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 388–392.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lapouse, R. & Monk, M. (1959). Fears and worries in a representative sample of children.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 29, 803–818.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lefkowitz, M. M., & Tesiny, E. P. (1985). Depression in Children: Prevalence and correlates.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 647–656.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Martini, D., Strayhorn, J., & Puig-Antich, J. (1990). A symptom self-report measure for preschoolers.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 27, 12–20.Google Scholar
  15. National Institute of Mental Health. (1991).Implementation of the national plan for research on child and adolescent mental disorders (Program Announcement PA-91-46). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  16. Pekarik, E., Prinz, R., Leibert, C., Weintraub, S., and Neale, J. (1976). The pupil evaluation inventory: A sociometric technique for assessing children's social behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4, 83–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Quay, H. (1986). Classification. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.,Psychopathological disorders of childhood (3rd ed. pp. 1–35). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1985).Revised Children's Manifest Anxiety Scale (R-CMAS) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  19. Siegel, S. (1956).Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  20. Wardrop, J. L. (1989). Review of the California Achievement Tests, Forms E and F. In J. Close Conoley & J. Kramer (Eds.),The tenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 128–133), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  21. Werthamer-Larsson, L., Kellam, S., & Wheeler, L. (1991). Effect of first grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 585–602.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Ialongo
    • 3
  • Gail Edelsohn
    • 1
  • Lisa Werthamer-Larsson
    • 3
  • Lisa Crockett
    • 2
  • Sheppard Kellam
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryJefferson Medical CollegePhiladelphia
  2. 2.Department of Individual and Family StudiesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity Park
  3. 3.Department of Mental Hygiene, School of Hygiene and Public HealthJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore

Personalised recommendations