Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie

, Volume 45, Issue 6, pp 465–474 | Cite as

Die orthodontisch-orthopädische Kombinationsbehandlung bei großer Frontzahnstufe

  • R. Lehman
  • H. van Beek


Die hier beschriebene Apparatur dient der Behandlung von Patienten mit großer Frontzahnstufe und tiefem Biß. Die Wirkungsweise und Behandlungsergebnisse wurden untersucht an einer Gruppe von 30 Patienten.


A simple appliance is described, which is effective in patients with an increased overjet and a deep bite. The results are evaluated in 30 consecutively treated cases.


Dans cet article, l'auteur décrit un appareil amovible simple, qui est actif chez des patients ayant une supraclusion et un surplomb incisifs accentués. On évalue les résultats de 30 cas traités consécutivement.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bass, N.M.: Dentofacial orthopedics in the correction of class 2 malocclusion. Brit. J. Orthodont. 9 (1982), 3–31.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beek, H. v.: Overjet correction by a combined headgear and activator. Europ. J. Orthod. 4 (1982), 279–290.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Enlow, D.M.: Handbook of facial growth. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fränkel, R.: A functional approach to orofacial orthopaedics. Brit. J. Orthodont. 7 (1980), 41–51.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haas, A.J.: Palatal expansion-Just the beginning of dentofacial orthopedics. Amer. J. Orthodont. 57 (1970), 219–255.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvold, E., K. Vargervik: Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. Amer. J. Orthodont. 60 (1971), 478–490.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Les Joffe, B.D.S., A. Jacobson: Maxillary orthopedic splint. Amer. J. Orthodont. 75 (1979), 54–69.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McNamara, J.R.: Quantitative analysis of temporo-mandibular joint adaptations to protrusive function. Amer. J. Orthodont. 76 (1979), 593–611.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McNamara, J.R.: Functional determinants of cranio-facial size and shape. Europ. J. Orthodont. 2 (1980), 131–159.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Petrovic, A.G., J.T. Stutzmann, C.L. Oudet: Control processes in the postnatal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. Determinants of mandibular form and growth, 101–153. Monograph No. 4, Craniofacial growth series, Center for Human growth and development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pfeiffer, J.P.D.: Simultaneous use of cervical applicance and activator—An orthpedic approach to fixed appliance therapy. Transactions of the Third International Orthodontic Congress. J.T. Cook, Crosby Lockwood Staples, London, p. 324–33.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teuscher, U.: A growth related concept for skeletal class 2 treatment. Amer. J. Orthodont. 74 (1978), 258–275.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thurow, R.C.: Craniomaxillary orthopedic correction with a masse dental control. Amer. J. Orthodont. 68 (1975), 601–624.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Urban & Schwarzenberg 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Lehman
    • 1
  • H. van Beek
    • 1
  1. 1.HeemskerkHolland

Personalised recommendations