Abstract
A comparison between the counting parameters of solid and liquid scintillation methods for radon determination in water is attempted. The counting efficiency is better for a toluene-based liquid scintillator but, as the background is considerably higher than in solid scintillators, the figure of merit and the lower limit of the measurable activity are favorable for a scintillation counter based on zinc sulfide (Ag activated) scintillator.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. Szabo, I. Chereji, IFA Preprint IS-57-1968.
A. Szabo, Radioactive Waters and Gases in Romania, Dacia Press, Cluj-Napoca, 1978.
H.M. Prichard, T.F. Gesell, Ch.R. Meyer, Liquid Scintillation Counting, Recent Applications and Development, Vol. 1, Academic Press, Inc., N.Y., 1980, pp. 347–355.
M. Noguchi,Radioisotopes, 13 (1964) 362.
N.J. Parks, K.K. Tsuboi,Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 29 (1978) 77.
K.G. Darrall, P.J. Richardson, J.F.C. Tyler,Analyst, 98 (1973) 610.
Y. Homma, Y. Murakami,J. Radioanal. Chem., 36 (1977) 173.
Y. Murakami, K. Horiuchi,J. Radioanal. Chem., 52 (1979) 725.
E. Tanaka,Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 16 (1965) 405.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chereji, I. 222Rn (226Ra) determination in water by scintillation methods. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Letters 165, 263–267 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02164765
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02164765