Skip to main content
Log in

Differential pulse voltammetric methods for the simultaneous estimation of uranium-iron and uranium-cadmium mixtures in solution

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differential pulse voltammetric methods have been developed for the simultaneous estimation of the constituents of uranium-iron and uranium-cadmium mixtures in solution. A mixture of 1M H3PO4−1M KH2PO4 (with a pH≈1.5), was found to be the most ideal supporting electrolyte for both methods, among many that were evaluated for their suitability. In uranium-iron mixtures the calibration for iron was found to be linear up to 150 μg ml−1 (r2=0.9986), while that of uranium up to 500 μg ml−1 (r2=0.999). Iron at 6.7 μg ml−1 level could be determined in the presence of 800 fold uranium (wt/wt) without significant interference. Uranium at 21 μg ml−1 level could be analyzed with 5-fold iron (wt/wt). This upper limit of iron was due to the precipitation of iron as phosphate. In the case of uranium — cadmium mixtures, cadmium calibration for cadmium was found to be linear up to 1300 μg ml−1 (r2=0.9993). Concentration levels of 4.6 μg ml−1 Cd could be determined at a 500-fold excess (wt/wt) of uranium. Uranium calibration was linear up to 500 μg ml−1 (r2=0.999) and 21 μg ml−1 uranium could tolerate up to a 1000-fold excess of cadmium (wt/wt). Both procedures could tolerate 10 μg ml−1 levels of metal ions, such as chromium, copper, manganese, molybdenum and vanadium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Srinivasan, M.N. Nadkarni, G.R. Balasubramanian, R.T. Chitnis, H.R. Siddique, Report BARC-643 (1972).

  2. B.F. Scribner, H.R. Mullin, Journal of Research National Bureau of Standards, 37, 379–389, Dec. 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.R. Joshi, U.M. Kasar,J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., Lett., 146 (1990) 401.

    Google Scholar 

  4. T. Fujinaga, H.L. Lee,Talanta, 24(6) (1977) 395.

    Google Scholar 

  5. I.M. Kolthoff, P.J. Elving, Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Interscience Publication, Part-II, Vol. 9., p. 74.

  6. Y.I. Chang, Report No. ANL/CP-75576 (1992).

  7. Principles and Practice of Analytical Chemistry, (Eds by F.W. Fifield and D. Kealy), p. 216.

  8. W.E. Harris, I.M. Kolthoff,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 67 (1945) 1484.

    Google Scholar 

  9. H.J. Shalgosky, AERE, Harwell, Report C/R 1869 (1956).

  10. W.E. Harris, I.M. Kolthoff,J. Am. Chem. Soc., 68 (1946) 1178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. T. Sawyer, J.U. Roberts, Jr., Experimental Electrochemistry for Chemists, Wiley Interscience Publication, p. 365.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sreenivasan, N.L., Srinivasan, T.G. Differential pulse voltammetric methods for the simultaneous estimation of uranium-iron and uranium-cadmium mixtures in solution. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Letters 201, 391–399 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02164215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02164215

Keywords

Navigation