Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Über den gegenwärtigen Stand des Hauptproblems der Strahlenbiologie

Modellversuche zum Primäreffekt der biologischen Strahlenwirkung I

  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two possibilities for the action of radiations on biological objects are still remaining: the effect by radiation-hits and the action by photochemical or radiochemical effects. By means of irradiating well-known chemical «model-substances» one may be able to decide between these two possibilities and to understand the biological primary effect of radiations.

Both of the theoretical perceptions are discussed and compared with the empirical facts. It is shown that in all well examinated cases of radiation effects upon biological elements or chemical systems, water or an other diluting is of essential importance. Radiation-energy is conducted from point of absorption to point of action by means of electronic transport or diffusion. Diffusion seems much more probable in biological systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Glocker, Z. Phys.46, 764 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Curie, C.R. Acad. Sci.134, 420 (1902).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Jaffé, Ann. Phys.25, 257 (1908).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Stahel, Impr. med. et scientifique, Bruxelles (1929).

  5. R. Reiter, Fortschr. Rö.Str.62, 122 (1940).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Becquerel, C.R. Acad. Sci.136, 1173 (1903).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Becker, Ann. Phys.12, 124 (1903).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Duane undO. Scheuer, Le Radium10, 33 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Günther undL. Holzapfel, Z. phys. Chem. B.44, 374 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Günther undL. Holzapfel, Z. phys. Chem. B.42, 346 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. C. Lind, The chemical effects of Alpha particles and electrons, 2nd edition, New York (1938).

  12. R. D. Kleemann, Proc. Roy. Soc. A.79, 220 (1907).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Blau undK. Altenburger, Z. Phys.12, 315 (1922).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. I. A. Crowther, Proc. Roy. Soc. B.100, 390 (1926).

    Google Scholar 

  15. TheSvedberg undS. Brohult, Nature143, 938 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Wegmüller, Diss. phil. II, Bern (1942).

  17. E. Wollmann undA. Lacassagne, Ann. Inst. Pasteur64, 5 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  18. P. Bonet-Maury, J. Chim. Phys.39, 116 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. Wollmann undA. Lacassagne, Ann. Inst. Pasteur64, 5 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  20. K. G. Zimmer undN. Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Z. indukt. Abst.-u. Vererb.-Lehre80, 353 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. G. Zimmer undN. Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Z. indukt. Abst.-u. Vererb.-Lehre80, 353 (1942).

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. Wollmann undA. Lacassagne, Ann. Inst. Pasteur64, 5 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Liechti undW. Minder, Radiol. Clin.10, 104 (1941).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Minder, Strahlenther.68, 30 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Arne G. Forssberg, Acta Radiol. Suppl. 49 (1943).

  26. N. Timoféeff-Ressovsky undK. G. Zimmer, Naturwiss.26, 32 6 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. C. Horn, J. Morphol.70, 185 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E. Wollmann, F. Holweck undS. Luria, Nature145, 935 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. D. E. Lea, R. B. Haines undC. A. Coulson, Proc. Roy. Soc.120, 47 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  30. V. Hardung, Helv. phys. acta18, 45 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. G. Brattain, J. phys. Chem.42, 617 (1938).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Günther undG. Leichter, Z. phys. Chem. B.34, 443 (1936).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Plotnikow, Photochemie, Leipzig (1928).

  34. S. C. Lind, The chemical effects of Alpha particles and electrons, 2nd edition, New York (1938).

  35. R. Sievert, Acta radiol.22, 237 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Th. van der Werff, Acta radiol.23, 603 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. G. Schwarz, Lehrb. Röntgenkde., Bd. 3, S. 71 ff., Leipzig (1932).

  38. G. Failla, Amer. J. Röntg.44, 649 (1940).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. E. Wertz, Strahlenther.68, 136 und 287 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  40. O. Jüngling, Lehrb. Strahlentherapie.

  41. H. Fricke undSt. Morse, Amer. J. Röntg.18, 426 (1927).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. H. Fricke undSt. Morse, Amer. J. Röntg.18, 430 (1927).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. Liechti, W. Minder undF. Wegmüller, Radiol. Clin.14, 167 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  44. R. Glocker undO. Risse, Z. Phys.48, 845 (1928).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. H. Fricke undE. R. Brownscombe, Phys. Rev.44, 240 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. W. Stenström undA. Lohmann, J. biol. Chem.79, 673 (1928).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. G. Cronheim undP. Günther, Z. phys. Chem. B.9, 201 (1930).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. F. Wegmüller, Diss. phil. II, Bern (1942).

  49. A. Liechti, W. Minder undF. Wegmüller, Radiol. Clin.14, 167 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  50. K. G. Zimmer, Fund. Radiol.5, 168 (1940).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. K. Sommermeyer, Strahlenther.69, 715 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  52. K. Sommermeyer, Strahlenther.70, 184 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  53. P. Günther, P. v. d. Horst undG. Cronheim, Z. El.chem.34, 616 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  54. P. Günther P. v. d. Horst undG. Cronheim, Z. El.chem.34, 616 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  55. O. Warburg, Über die katalytische Wirkung der lebenden Substanz, Berlin (1928).

  56. R. Emerson undW. Arnold, J. gen. Physiol.16, 191 (1932).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. H. Gaffron undK. Wohl, Naturwiss.24, 81 und 103 (1936).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. F. Wegmüller, Diss. phil. II, Bern (1942).

  59. K. G. Zimmer, Phys. Z.45, 265 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  60. F. Möglich, R. Rompe undN. Timoféeff-Ressovsky, Naturwiss.30, 409 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. N. Riehl, Naturwiss.28, 601 (1940).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. N. Riehl, Ann. Phys.29, 636 (1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. E. Streck, Ann. Phys.35, 58 (1939).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. W. Duane undO. Scheuer, Le Radium10, 33 (1913).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. P. Günther undL. Holzapfel, Z. phys. Chem. B.44, 374 (1939).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. O. Risse, Strahlenther.34, 578 (1929).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. O. Risse, Ergebn. Physiol. 242 (1928).

  68. P. Günther undL. Holzapfel, Z. phys. Chem. B.49, 303 (1941).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. R. Reiter, Fortschr. Rö. Str.62, 122 (1940).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bern

    W. Minder & A. Liechti

Authors
  1. W. Minder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Liechti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minder, W., Liechti, A. Über den gegenwärtigen Stand des Hauptproblems der Strahlenbiologie. Experientia 1, 298–307 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163802

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02163802

Search

Navigation