Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative substoichiometric extraction and quantification of mercury in geological water samples with potassium salts of ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl and benzyl xanthates

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative extent of extraction of mercury with potassium salts of ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl and benzyl xanthates has been studied employing a sensitive and rapid substoichiometric radiochemical method. The effect of pH on the extractability of mercury xanthate complexes into chloroform was investigated. Buffer solutions of pH 12, 11, 10, 9 and 5.5 were found to be suitable media for the maximum extraction of mercury as ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl and benzyl xanthate complexes, respectively. The procedures developed were utilized for the determination of mercury content in standard solutions and geological water samples collected in eight parts of Chittoor district of Andhra Pradesh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. M. Donaldson,Talanta, 26 (1976) 411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Chandrasekhar Reddy, B. Rangamannar,Radiochim. Acta, 55 (1991) 55.

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. A. Vogel, Quantitative Inorganic Analysis, Longman Green & Co., Third Edition 1969, 401.

  4. L. S. Foster, The preparation of xanthates and other organic thiocarbamates, Utah Eng. Expt. 1 Sta. Tech. Paper: 2 1929.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reddy, P.C., Rangamannar, B. Comparative substoichiometric extraction and quantification of mercury in geological water samples with potassium salts of ethyl, propyl, butyl, pentyl and benzyl xanthates. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Letters 213, 9–19 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162481

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162481

Keywords

Navigation