Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einfluss von Streptomycin und von Tetracyclinen auf die Entwicklung keimender Samen

  • Kurze Mitteilungen
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Euler (1947) andM. L. Stein (1953) had observed that germinating seeds of barley, rye, wheat and other grasses are colourless when exposed to solutions containing more than 0.2% of streptomycin or dihydrostreptomycin. These plants are not inhibited in growth. The chlorophyll already formed is not destroyed by streptomycin.

The present authors describe the bleaching effect on germinating seeds of chlortetracycline and tetracycline. These antibiotics inhibit or reduce the formation of chlorophyll in germinating seeds but the authors could not obtain this inhibition without toxic effects (reduced growth). Contrary to streptomycin, the tetracyclines are not able to precipitate nucleic acids and nucleoproteins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. B. v. Euler, Kem. Arb. [NF. II]9, 1 (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bracco undH. v. Euler, Kem. Arb. [NF. II]10, I und II (1947).

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. v. Euler, Ark. Kemi, Min. Geol. [A]26, Nr. 6 (1948); Ark. Kemi1, Nr. 31 (1949).

  4. H. v. Euler undL. Heller, Ark. Kemi1, Nr. 31 (1949); C. r. Acad. Sci.227, 16 (1948).

  5. Siehe auch:F. Cedrangolo, Acta Pont. Acad. Sci.14, Nr. 7 (1951).

  6. L. Provasoli, S. H. Hutner undA. Schatz, Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med.69, 279 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Provasoli, S. H. Hutner undI. J. Pintner, Cold Sprung Harbor Symp. quant. Biol.16, 113 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. W. H. Schopfer und Mitarbeiter, Arch. Sci.5, 9 (1952); Soc. Helv. Sci. nat.1936, 320.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bull. Soc. chim. Biol.36, 1195 (1954).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Rosen, Ohio J. Sci.54, 73 (1954); Soc. exp. Biol. Med.85, 385 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Bogorad, Amer. J. Bot.37, 676 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. M. Wright, Ann. Bot.15, 493 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Giuliano, M. L. Stein undH. v. Euler, Ark. Kemi6, Nr. 53 (1954).

  14. S. A. Waksman andH. B. Woodruff, J. Bact.40, 585 (1940).

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Brockmann und Mitarbeiter, Naturwissenschaften36, 376 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Siehe auch Actinomycin X in Naturwissenschaften40, 225 (1953).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chr. Hackmann, Z. Krebsf.58, 607 (1952); Strahlenther.1953, 296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Bohonos et al. Antibiotics Ann. 1953–1954, 49.

  19. J. S. Kiser et al. Antibiotics Ann. 1953–1954, 57.

  20. R. W. Cunningham et al. Antibiotics Ann. 1953–1954, 63.

  21. Starke Unterschiede zwischen verschiedenen Getreidearten sind schon bezüglich anderer chemischer Einflüsse, zum Beispiel von Carbamaten, gefunden worden. SieheW. G. Templeman undW. A. Sexton, Nature156, 630 (1945).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Michell, Marth undPreston, jr., Science120, 263 (1954).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. SieheÅ. Gustafsson, Hereditas28, 483 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. H. v. Euler, B. Bergman, H. Hellström undD. Burström, Hereditas21, 119 (1934).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Holm, Acta Agric. Scand.4, 466 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neomycin, entdeckt vonS. A. Waksman undH. A. Lechevalier, Science109, 305 (1949).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuehl et al. J. Amer. Chem. Soc.71, 2590 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. Giuliano, M. L. Stein undH. v. Euler, Ark. Kemi6, Nr. 53 (1954).

  29. L. Ziéglé, C. r. Acad. Sci.231, 310 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  30. H. Brockman und Mitarbeiter, Chem. Ber.84, 284 (1951);87, 856 (1954).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. H. v. Euler, Z. physiol. Chem.295, 411 (1953).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Siehe auchC. L. Hamner undH. B. Tukey, Bot. Gazz.112, 525 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. C. Meter, J. J. Olesen undJ. H. Williams, Science113, 273 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Proc. exp. Biol. Med.81, 215 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. H. A. Lardy, J. Biol. Chem.195, 215 und 225 (1952).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. P. Roine undT. Ettala, Nature169, 1014 (1952).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. H. J. Eisner et al., Pharm. exp. Therap.108, 442 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für organisch-chemische Forschung der Universität Stockholm, Sweden

    H. v. Euler & M. L. Stein

Authors
  1. H. v. Euler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. L. Stein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

v. Euler, H., Stein, M.L. Einfluss von Streptomycin und von Tetracyclinen auf die Entwicklung keimender Samen. Experientia 11, 108–110 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02161695

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02161695

Search

Navigation