Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 80, Issue 2, pp 155–169 | Cite as

Response of Douglas fir seedlings to phosphorus fertilization and influence of temperature on this response

  • R. van den Driessche
Article

Summary

Effects of P fertilizers on growth of Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var.menziesii (Mirb.) Franco.) seedlings were examined in pots and nursery beds. In pot experiments levels of P equivalent to 300 kg/ha were adequate for maximum growth over 14–18 weeks and resulted in available soil P levels of 80 ppm after 15 weeks' growth. Maximum growth in pots was obtained with shoot P concentrations of 0.18%–0.20%, with higher values at lower temperatures, but the optimum concentration for one-year old (1-0) nursery seedlings was 0.16% P. Growth of seedlings was greatly restricted at a soil temperature of 5°C and an air temperature of 12°C. At a soil temperature of 10°C and an air temperature of 14°C seedling P requirement was greater than at soil and air temperatures of 20°C.

Comparison showed that monammonium phosphate was more effective than calcium superphosphate in stimulating growth in pots and nursery. Triple superphosphate was also effective in the nursery. Diammonium phosphate, potassium dihydrogen phosphate and phosphoric acid had no advantages as P sources in the nursery. Available P levels of 100–130 ppm, in the loamy sand and sandy loam nurseries studied, and needle P concentrations of 0.18%, when sampled in October, were associated with maximum growth of two-year old (2-0) seedlings.

P fertilization decreased root/shoot ratio, but did not alter the allometric relationship of shoot to root. Improving P status from a low level increased root growth capacity in 2-0 seedlings and P fertilization of potted seedlings increased dry weight/height ratio. Uptakes per seed bed ha of 236 kg N, 31 kg P, 81 kg K and 73 kg Ca by 2-0 seedlings were comparable with, or greater than, uptake rates of agricultural crops. Recoveries of 6–11% of P from fertilizer were recorded in the nursery.

Key words

Douglas fir Fertilizer Foliar analysis Pseudotsuga menziesii Phosphorus Soil phosphorus Temperature 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aldhous J R 1972 Nursery practice. Forestry Commission Bull 43, 1–184. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beaton J D, Speer R C and Brown G 1965 Effect of soil temperature and length of reaction period on water solubility of phosphorus in soil fertilizer reaction zones. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29, 194–197.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benzian B 1965 Experiments on nutrition problems in forest nurseries I. Forestry Commission Bull 37, 1–251. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benzian B and Freeman S C R 1973 Reference experiments on young confiers at Woburn Experimental Farm, 1961–69. Rep. Rothamsted Exp. Stn. pp 152–276.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brix H 1967 An analysis of dry matter production of Douglas-fir seedlings in relation to temperature and light intensity. Can. J. Bot. 45, 2063–2972.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burdett A N 1979 New methods for measuring root growth capacity: their value in assessing lodgepole pine stock quality. Can. J. For. Res. 9, 63–67.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heilman P E and Ekuan G 1980 Effects of phosphorus on growth and mycorrhizal development of Douglas-fir in greenhouse pots. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 115–119.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heninger R L and White D P 1974 Tree seedling growth at different soil temperatures. Forest Sci. 20, 363–367.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jackson M L 1958 Soil Chemical Analysis. p.1–485. Constable and Co. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Knight P J 1978 Fertilizer practice in New Zealand forest nurseries. N.Z. J. For. Sci. 8, 27–53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ledig F T and Perry T O 1965 Physiological genetics of the shoot-root ratio. Proceedings Soc. Amer. Foresters pp 39–43. Detroit, Michigan.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lopushinsky W and Kaufman M 1983 Effects of cold soil on water relations and spring growth of Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Sci. (In press).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mengel K and Kirkby E A 1978 Principles of Plant Nutrition. pp 1–593. International Potash Institute P.O. Box CH3048 Worblaufen-Bern. Switzerland.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller M H 1974 Effects of nitrogen on phosphorus absorption by plants.In The Plant Root and its Environment. Ed. W E Carson. pp 643–668. University Press of Virginia Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nielsen K F 1974 Roots and root temperature.In The Plant Root and its Environment. Ed. E W Carson. pp 293–333 University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Richards N A, Leaf A L and Bickelhaupt D 1979 Growth and nutrient uptake of coniferous seedlings: comparison among 10 species at various seedbed densities. Plant and Soil 38, 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smilde K W 1973 Phosphorus and micronutrient metal uptake by some tree species as affected by phosphate and lime applied to an acid sandy soil. Plant and Soil 39, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van den Driessche R 1980 Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on Douglas-fir nursery growth and survival after outplanting. Can. J. For. Res. 10, 65–70.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van den Driessche R 1983 Growth, survival and physiology of Douglas-fir seedlings following root wrenching and fertilization. Can. J. For. Res. 13, 270–278.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van den Driessche R 1983 Soil fertility in forest nurseries.In Production of Bare Root Seedlings in the North West Eds. M Duryea and T Landis, Chapter 8. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis (In press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff/Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. van den Driessche
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Branch Provincial Ministry of ForestsVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations