Summary
The effects which the osmotic pressures 2.0, 3.5 and 5.0 atm., obtained by the addition of either magnesium sulphate or PEG-4000 to the standard nutrient solution, have on the development and mineral content ofZea mays var. INIA 8302 are assessed. The osmotic effect causes a greater absorption of cations, potassium being the element most readily absorbed. The specific effect of magnesium sulphate causes a decrease in the total of anions and in the water content of the plant and partly offsets the decrease which the osmotic effect produces in the fresh weight.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernstein, L. 1961 Osmotic adjustment of plant to saline media. II dynamic phase. Am. J. Bot.50, 360–370.
Bernstein, L. and Hayward, H. E. 1958 Physiology of salt tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.9, 25–46.
Hewitt, E. J. 1966 Sand and water culture methods use in the study of plant nutrition. Techn. Commun. No.22. Commonw. Agric. Bur. London, 547 p.
Hoagland, D. R. and Snyder, W. C. 1933 Nutrition of strawberry plants under controlled conditions (a) Effects of deficiences of boron and certain other elements (b) Susceptibility to injury from sodium salts. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.30, 288–295.
Hyden, S. 1955 A turbidimetric method for determination of higher polyethylene glycols in biologicals materials. Ann. Roy. Agric. Coll. Sweden22, 139–145.
Ignatieff, V. and Page, H. J. 1958 Efficient use of fertilizers. Food and Agriculture Organisation. Rome. (from Arnon, I. 1975 Mineral nutrition of maize, International Potash Institute, Switzerland 228 p.)
Janes, B. E. 1966 Adjustment mechanism of plants subjected to varied osmotic pressures of nutrient solution. Soil Sci.101, 180–188.
Lagerwerff, J. V. and Eagle, H. E. 1961 Osmotic and specific effect of excess salts on beans. Plant Physiol.36, 472–477.
Maas, E. V. and Hoffman, G. F. 1977 Crop salts tolerance-current assessment. J. Irr. Drainage Div. ASCE.103 (IR12) 115–134.
Mercado, B. T. 1970 The Na-resistance ofBeta vulgaris var. crassa,Phaseolus vulgaris var. manus and var. vulgaris andZea mays. Protoplasma69, 151–170.
Métodos de referencia para la determinación de elementos minerales en vegetales. Anal. Edaf. Agrob.28, 409–430.
Patel, P. and Wallace, A. 1976 P fertility and mixed salinity on growth an Ca, Mg, Na, P and Cl concentration of tomato, corn and sudan grass grown in sand culture. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant. Anal.7, 375–385.
Olson, R. A. and Lucas, R. E. 1966 Fertility requirements secondary and micronutrients, Advances in corn production, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa 285 p.
Ruff, R. H., Eckert, R. E. and Gifford, R. O. 1967 Components of osmotic adjustment of plants to rapid changes in root medium osmotic pressure. Soil Sci.104, 159–162.
Sánchez Conde, M. P. and Azura, P. 1979 Equipo automático para cultivo hidropónico con sulución circulante. Anal. Edaf. Agrob.38, 207–220.
Sánchez Conde, M. P. and Azuara, P. 1979 Estudio y uso de los polietilenglicoles en experimentos con plantas. Anal. Edaf. Agrob. (In press).
Sands, R. and Clarke, A. R. P. 1977 Response of Radiata Pine to salt stress. I Water relations, osmotic adjustment and salt uptake. Aust. J. Plant Physiol.4, 637–646.
Shaw, R. H. 1976 Moisture stress effects on corn in Iowa in 1974. Iowa St. J. Res.50, 335–342.
Slatyer, R. O. 1961 Effects of several osmotic substrates on the water relationships of tomato. Aust. J. Biol. Sci.14, 519–540.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sanchez Conde, M.P., Azuara, P. Osmotic and specific effects of magnesium sulphate on the mineral content ofZea mays . Plant Soil 55, 121–131 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02149715
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02149715