Skip to main content
Log in

Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report the prevalence of postoperative complications and mortality of patients with colorectal cancer when treated by conventional surgery. METHODS: Morbidity and mortality following open resection for colorectal cancer were analyzed in 1,846 patients whose clinical, operative, and pathology data were prospectively documented over a 20-year period. RESULTS: Mortality following elective resection of the left and right colon was low, whereas overall morbidity was high (37.2 percent). Respiratory and cardiac complications were especially common. Incidence of clinically significant leakage was similar following right (0.5 percent) or left (1.1 percent) hemicolectomy. Incidence of anastomotic leakage was significantly higher after emergency right hemicolectomy (4.3 percent). Overall morbidity following excision of the rectum was high (40.2 percent). Respiratory and cardiac complications predominated. Incidence of clinically significant anastomotic leakage following anterior resection was low (2.9 percent). Over the years, there has been a decline in the number of patients with tumor demonstrated histologically in a line of resection, suggesting an improved local surgical clearance. CONCLUSIONS: These results following conventional surgery may be useful when evaluating new techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coates M, McCredie M, Taylor R. Cancer in New South Wales: incidence and mortality 1990. Sydney NSW Central Cancer Registry, Cancer Epidemiology Research Unit, NSW Cancer Council, 1992.

  2. Chapuis PH, Pheils MT. Report of a multidisciplinary research programme for colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 1981;1:15–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. International Classification of Diseases 9th Revision, Clinical Modification: ICD-9-CM. 9th ed. Michigan: HCIA, 1992.

  4. Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Hughes WJ, Koorey SG, Hinder JM, Edwards R. Morbidity, mortality and survival following resection for carcinoma of the rectum at Concord Hospital. Aust N Z J Surg 1990;60:253–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Newland RC, Chapuis PH, Smyth EJ. The prognostic value of substaging colorectal carcinoma: a prospective study of 1117 cases with standardized pathology. Cancer 1987;60:852–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chapuis PH, Newland RC, Dent OF, Bokey EL, Hinder JM. Current perspectives in staging large bowel cancer. Aust N Z J Surg 1990;60:261–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fielding LP, Aresnault PA, Chapuis PH,et al. Clinicopathological staging for colorectal cancer: an international documentation system (IDS) and an international comprehensive terminology (ICAT). Gastroenterol Hepatol 1991;6:325–44.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Davis NC, Newland RC. Terminology and classification of colorectal adenocarcinoma: the Australian clinicopathological staging system. Aust N Z J Surg 1983;53:211–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G. Anastomotic integrity after operations for large bowel cancer: a multicenter study. BMJ 1980;281:411–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goligher JC. Current trends in the use of sphincter saving excision in the treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. Cancer 1982;50:2627.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mettlin C, Mittelman A, Natarajan N, Murphey GP, Schmitz RL, Smart CR. Trends in the United States for the management of adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;153:701–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heald RJ. Towards fewer colostomies—the impact of circular stapling devices on the surgery of rectal cancer in the District Hospital. Br J Surg 1980;67:198–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Knight CD, Griffin FD. Techniques of low rectal reconstruction. Curr Probl Surg 1983;20:391–456.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L. Covering stoma for elective anterior resection of the rectum: an outmoded operation? Am J Surg 1984;147:524–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Polglase AL, Hughes ES, McDermott FT, Burke FR. A comparison of end-to-end staple and suture colorectal anastomosis in the dog. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:793–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wehrli H, Akovbiantza A. The stapled low colorectal anastomosis. Our experience with 342 patients (1981–1989). In: Givel JC, Oates GD, Thomson JP, eds. Updates in colo-proctology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992:11–5.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goligher J. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1984:707.

    Google Scholar 

Reference

  1. Keighley MR, Williams NS, eds. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. Vol. 1. London: WB Saunders, 1993:1025.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.

About this article

Cite this article

Bokey, E.L., Chapuis, P.H., Fung, C. et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 38, 480–487 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148847

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148847

Key words

Navigation