Abstract
Induction of chromosomally mediatedβ-lactamases was studied in clinical isolates ofEnterobacter cloacae andCitrobacter freundii. Whereas isolates resistant to ampicillin and cefoxitin exhibited an inducible enzyme, those sensitive to both agents did not. Cefoxitin and above all imipenem proved the most efficacious enzyme inducers. Variants among these inducible isolates which produced large amounts ofβ-lactamase could be selected in the presence of cefamandole. In each of these selected variants constitutive enzyme production was markedly enhanced by induction, even with compounds lacking induction potency for the corresponding wild strains. Moreover, these variants could also be induced non-specifically, i.e. by non-β-lactam compounds. Production of large amounts of enzyme was associated with resistance to all availableβ-lactam compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sanders, C. C.: Novel resistance selected by the new expanded-spectrum cephalosporins: a concern. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1983, 147: 585–589.
Seeberg, A. H., Tolxdorff-Neutzling, R. M., Wiedemann, B.: Chromosomalβ-lactamase ofEnterobacter cloacae are responsible for resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 23: 918–925.
Gootz, Th. D., Sanders, C. C., Goering, R. V.: Resistance to cefamandole: derepression of beta-lactamase by cefoxitin and mutation inEnterobacter cloacae. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1982, 146: 34–42.
Cullmann, W., Opferkuch, W., Stieglitz, M., Dick, W.: Influence of spontaneous and inducibleβ-lactamase production on the antimicrobial activity of recently developedβ-lactam compounds. Chemotherapy 1984, 30: 175–181.
Cullmann, W., Dick, W., Dalhoff, A.: Nonspecific induction ofβ-lactamase inEnterobacter cloacae. Journal of General Microbiology 1984, 130: 1781–1786.
Knippers, R.: Molekulare Genetik. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, 1982.
Cullmann, W., Flensberg, Th., Opferkuch, W., Stieglitz, M., Wiedemann, B.: Correlation ofβ-lactamase production and resistance toβ-lactam antibiotics inEnterobacteriaceae. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene (A) 1982, 252: 480–489.
Gootz, Th. D., Sanders, C. C.: Characterization ofβ- lactamase induction inEnterobacter cloacae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 23: 91–97.
Markwell, M. A. K., Hass, S. M., Bieber, L. L., Tolbert, N. K.: A modification of the L.owry procedure to simplify protein determinations in membrane and lipoprotein samples. Analytical Biochemistry 1978, 87: 206–210.
Jones, R. V., Wilson, H. W., Novick jr., W. J., Barry, A. L., Thomberry, C.: In-vitro evaluation of CentaR, a new beta-lactamase susceptible chromogenic cephalosporin reagent. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1982, 15: 954–958.
Minami, S., Yotsuji, A., Inoue, M., Mitsuhashi, S.: Induction ofβ-lactamase by variousβ-lactam antibiotics inEnterobacter cloacae. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 18: 382–385.
Dalhoff, A., Cullmann, W.: Evidence for non-specific induction ofβ-lactamases inPseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1984, 14: 349–359.
Then, R. L.: Properties of Ro 13-9904 as a substrate and inhibitor ofβ-lactamases. Chemotherapy 1981, 27, Supplement: 25–31.
Sykes, R. B.: The classification and terminology of enzymes that hydrolyzeβ-lactam antibiotics. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1982, 145: 762–765.
Cullmann, W., Dick, W.: Investigations ofβ-lactamase stability of recently developedβ-lactam compounds: study of enzyme kinetics. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Mikrobiologie und Hygiene (A) 1983, 253: 426–434.
Normark, St., Edlund, Th., Grundström, Th., Bergström, S., Wolf-Watz, H.:Escherichia coli K-12 mutants hyperproducing chromosomalβ-lactamase by gene repetitions. Journal of Bacteriology 1977, 132: 912–922.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cullmann, W., Dick, W. Evidence for nonspecific induction of beta-lactamase in overproducing variants ofEnterobacter cloacae andCitrobacter freundii . Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 4, 34–40 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148657
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02148657