Skip to main content
Log in

Enrollment patterns and academic performance as a function of registration under a pass-fail grading system

  • Published:
Interchange Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An experimental “pass-fail” grading system was examined to determine if interdisciplinary exploration was encouraged by modifying the competitive aspects of grading and to examine the performance of students enrolling in pass-fail courses in the light of their past achievement and the performance of classmates. Results of the study suggest that the pass-fail grading situation encouraged study across a wider area of subjects, but also was associated with lower achievement as reflected by a familiar grading scheme. A review of the literature indicated that a need for valid evaluation of student progress is acknowledged by virtually all writers, but that numerous arguments attack the manner in which grades are assigned and used and attack the lack of knowledge about the psychometric attributes of traditional grading arrangements.

Résumé

Un système expérimental de notation “réussite-échec” a été mis à l'étude afin de déterminer si l'on pourrait encourager l'exploration interdisciplinaire en modifiant les aspects compétitifs de la notation et aussi afin d'évaluer le rendement des étudiants inscrits aux cours notés selon système réussite-échec à la lumière des réalisations antérieures de ces étudiants et du rendement de leurs camarades de classe. Les résultats de cette étude laissent entendre que le système en question a encouragé les étudiants à porter leur intérêt vers un plus grand nombre de sujets, mais qu'il s'en est suivi des résultats moins brillants en comparaison des résultats obtenus par le système de notation classique. Une étude de la littérature publiée à ce sujet indique que presque tous les auteurs reconnaissent la nécessité de disposer d'une méthode d'évaluation valable des progrès des étudiants, mais il existe de nombreux arguments contre la façon dont les notes sont accordées et utilisées et contre le manque de connaissance des attributs psychométriques de la méthode de notation traditionnelle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, L. R. Jr. The grading behavior of a college faculty.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1963,23, 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. L.Graduate admissions and fellowship selection policies and procedures. Part I. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbow, P. H., More accurate evaluation of student performance.The Journal of Higher Education, 1969,40, 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, P.Compulsory mis-education and the community of scholars. New York: Vintage Books, Random House, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D. P. College grades and adult accomplishment: A review of research.Educational Record, 1966,47, 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, D. P. Rationality and the grading process.Educational Record, 1970,51, 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlins, M., Kaplan, M., & Stuart, W. Academic attitudes and performance as a function of differential grading systems: An evaluation of Princeton's pass-fail system.The Journal of Experimental Education, 1969,37, 38–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, S. P., & Thompson, R. Grading and the nature of the discipline.The Journal of Higher Education, 1968,39, 517–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannello, G. Grades must go!Educational Record, 1969,50, 305–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. S.Teaching without grades. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press, 1968. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. S. Triangular grading.College and University, 1968,43, 143–149. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, M. S. Your grades are?College and University, 1969,44, 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. Measure, number and weight: A polemical statement of the college grading problem. Unpublished paper, Academic Senate Select Committee on Education, University of California, Berkeley, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, O. What it is ... I measure I do not know.Educational Record, 1968,49, 160–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quann, C. Pass-fail—what are the trends?College and University, 1970,45, 484–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raimi, R. A. Examinations and grades in college.American Association of University Professors Bulletin, 1967,53, 309–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossmann, J. E. Graduate school attitudes to S-U grades.Educational Record, 1970,51, 310–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seawall, F. A quality grading systemCollege and University, 1967,43, 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sgan, M. R. The first year of pass-fail at Brandeis University: A report.The Journal of Higher Education, 1969,40, 135–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. Z. &, Durbin, J. E. Marks and marking systems. In C. W. Harris (Ed.),Encyclopedia of Educational Research. (3d ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1960. Pp. 783–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, W., & Leslie E. K., Student attitudes toward grades and grading.Improving College and University Teaching, 1970,18, 66–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, W. C.: Grades and objectives in higher education.Educational Record, 1968,49, 85–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. R.. Current grading practices. Research Report No. 3, American Association for Higher Education, Washington, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westland, G. The philosophy of student assessment.Universities Quarterly, 1969,23, 350–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. M. Increased selectivity and institutional grading standards. Unpublished paper, College Research Center, Poughkeepsie, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiner, J.R., Jung, L.B. Enrollment patterns and academic performance as a function of registration under a pass-fail grading system. Interchange 3, 53–62 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145943

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02145943

Keywords

Navigation