Abstract
The silent period hypothesis was investigated by examining the speech development of AO, a Polish-speaking child, who emigrated to the U.S. at age 7 years, 5 months, and placed in the second grade of a rural Missouri school district in which there was no instruction of English as a second-language. AO was observed for 6 years, 8 months, in order to study the development of his English speech patterns. During this interval, recordings were made of five sentences produced by AO at five different age points and with recordings from a control group of native and nonnative speakers were rated by native American speakers. AO's accent showed a gradual decline during the first year of residence, receiving a rating of near-native speech. By age 14 years, 6 months, he was rated as having native speech performance. Observations of his language, social, and school development indicated that AO remained essentially silent during the first 6 months, using two- and three-word sentences only when necessary, that his social development was normal, and that his school achievement was not impeded by his placement in the grade level appropriate for his age. The conclusion was reached that AO's silent period experience contributed significantly to his development of English speech patterns.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning.The Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–341.
Asher, J. J., & Garcia, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language.The Modern Language Journal, 53, 3–17.
Burling, R., Becker, A. L., Henry, P. B., & Tomasowa, J. (1981), Machine-aided instruction in Bahasa Indonesia. In H. Winitz (Ed.),The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Crowder, R. G., & Morton, J. (1969). Pre-categorical acoustic storage (PAS).Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 365–373.
Dunn, L. M. (1959).Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Minneapolis: American Guidance Service.
Flege, J. E. (1981). The phonological basis of foreign accent: A hypothesis.TESOL Quarterly, 15, 443–455.
Flege, J. E. (1988). The production and perception of foreign language speech sounds. In H. Winitz (Ed.),Human communication and its disorders, A review 1988. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gleason, H. A. (1961).An introduction to descriptive linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Ingram, D. (1989).Phonological disability in children. Jersey City, NJ: Whurr Publishers.
Kent, R. D. (1976). Anatomical and neuromuscular maturation of the speech mechanism: Evidence from acoustic studies.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 421–447.
Kent, R. D., & Lybolt, J. T. (1982). Techniques of therapy based on motor learning theory. In W. H. Perkins (Ed.),Current therapy of communication disorders. New York: Thieme-Stratton.
Krashen, S. D. (1981).Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985).The input hypothesis: Issues and implications, New York: Longman.
Lee, L. L. (1971).Northwestern Syntax Screening Test (NSST). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967).Biological foundations of language learning. New York: Wiley.
Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised.Cognition, 21, 1–36.
McCandless, P., & Winitz, H. (1986). Test of pronunciation following one year of comprehension instruction in college German.Modern Language Journal, 70, 355–362.
Major, R. C. (1987). Phonological similarity, markedness, and rate of L2 acquisition.Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 63–82.
Neufeld, G. G. (1978). On the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features in adult language learning.Canadian Modern Language Review, 34, 161–174.
Newmark, L. (1981). Participatory observation: How to succeed in language learning. In H. Winitz (Ed.),The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–283.
Pisoni, D. B. (1973). Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.Perception and Psychophysics, 13, 253–260.
Postovsky, V. A. (1981). The priority of aural comprehension in the language acquisition process. In H. Winitz (Ed.),The comprehension approach to foreign language instruction. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Scovel, T. (1981). The recognition of foreign accents in English and its implications for psycholinguistic theories of language acquisition. InProceedings of the 5th Congress of L'Association Internationale, de Linguistique Appliquée (pp. 389–40). Québec: Les Presses de L'Université Laval.
Scovel, T. (1988).A Time to speak, A psycholinguistic inquiry into the critical period for human speech. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Seliger, H. W., Krashen, S. D., & Ladefoged, P. (1975). Maturational constraints in the acquisition of second language accent.Language Sciences 36, 20–22.
Snow, C. (1987). Relevance of the notion of a critical period to language acquisition. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.),Sensitive periods in development: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1977). Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds.Language and Speech, 20, 357–365.
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning.Child Development, 49, 1114–1128.
Tahta, S. Wood, M., & Loewenthal, K. (1981). Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language.Language and Speech, 24, 265–272.
Templin, M. C. (1957).Certain language skills in children, their development and interrelationships (Institute of Child Welfare, Monograph Series, No. 26) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Williams, L. (1979). The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning.Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 95–104.
Williams, L. (1980). Phonetic variation as a function of second-language learning. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, J. F. Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.),Child phonology: Vol. 2. Perception. New York: Academic Press.
Winitz, H. (1981). Input considerations in the comprehension of first and second language. In H. Winitz (Ed.),Native language and foreign language acquisition (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 379). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
Winitz, H., & Reeds, J. (1975).Comprehension and problem solving as strategies for language training. The Hague: Mouton
Wong Filmore, L. (1989). Teachability and second language acquisition. In M. L. Rice & R. L. Schiefelbusch (Eds.),The teachability of language. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Wong Fillmore, L., Ammon, P., McLaughlin, B., & Ammon, M. S. (1985).Learning English through bilingual instruction (Final Report). Berkeley and Santa Cruz: Departments of Education, University of California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winitz, H., Gillespie, B. & Starcev, J. The development of English speech patterns of a 7-year-old Polish-speaking child. J Psycholinguist Res 24, 117–143 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143959
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143959