Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution and recovery of15N after fertilization of Douglas-fir saplings with different nitrogen sources

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Four-year-old Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) saplings planted in pots with a sand and peat mix (1∶1) were fertilized at the rate of 200 kg N/ha of (15NH2)2CO (U-15),15NH4NO3 (A-15) and NH4 15NO3(An-15). They were placed in a shadehouse and watered regularly to maintain soil moisture at field capacity over periods of one and two years. Quantity of15N in foliage generally increased from old to current growth, irrespective of the nitrogen source. Utilization of15N fertilizers by saplings after the first and second growing seasons following fertilization was greatest with nitrate labelled ammonium nitrate AN-15, and nearly equal for urea U-15 and ammonium labelled ammonium nitrate A-15. The soil immobilized more fertilizer nitrogen-15 from U-15 and A-15 than from AN-15. Data from the present study, in which leaching losses of fertilizer were minimized, demonstrated that in terms of nitrogen uptake by the saplings the nitrate fertilizer was superior to ammonium fertilizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bremner J M and Mulvaney C S 1982 Nitrogen — Total.In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Monogr. No. 9, 2nd ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, p 595–624.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brix H 1981 Effects of nitrogen fertilizer source and application rates of foliar nitrogen concentration, photosynthesis, and growth of Douglas-fir. Can. J. For. Res. 11, 775–780.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Carrier D and Bernier D 1971 Pertes d'azote par volatilization ammoniacale apres fertilisation en foret de pin gris. Can. J. For. Res. 1, 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Craig J R and Wollum A G II 1982 Ammonia volatilization and soil nitrogen changes after urea and ammonium nitrate fertilization ofPinus taeda L. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 409–414.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dangerfield J and Brix H 1979 Comparative effects of ammonium nitrate and urea fertilizers on tree growth and soil processes.In Proceedings Forest Fertilization Conference. Ed. S P Gessel. University of Washington. pp 133–139.

  6. Dev G and Rennie D A 1979 Isotope studies on the comparative efficiency of nitrogenous sources. Aust. J. Soil Res. 17, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harrington C A and Miller R D 1979 Response of a 110-year-old Douglas-fir stand to urea and ammonium nitrate fertilization. USDA For. Ser. Res. Note PNW-336. Pacific Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn. Portland, Oregon. 8 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heilman P E, Dao T M, Cheng H H, Webster S R and Christensen L 1982 Comparison of fall and spring applications of15N-labelled urea to Douglas-firs II. Fertilizer recovery in trees and soil after 2 years. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 1300–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krajina V J, Madoc-Jones S and Mellor G 1973 Ammonium and nitrate in the nitrogen economy of some conifers growing in Douglas-fir communities of the Pacific North-West of America. Soil Biol. Biochem. 5, 143–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahendrappa M K and Ogden E D 1973 Patterns of ammonia volatilization from a forest soil. Plant and Soil 38, 257–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marshall V G and DeBell D 1980 Comparison of four methods of measuring volatilization loses of nitrogen following urea fertilization of forest soils. Can. J. Soil Sci. 60, 549–563.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mead D J and Pritchett W L 1975 Fertilizer movement in a slash pine ecosystem II. N distribution after two growing seasons. Plant and Soil 43, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nommik H 1966 The uptake and translocation of fertilizer15N in young trees of Scot pine and Norway spruce. Studia forestalia Suecica, 35, 18 p.

  14. Pang P C and Cho C M 1984 Oxygen consumption and denitrification activity of a conifer forest soil profile. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48, 393–399.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rennie R J and Rennie D A 1973 Standard isotope versus nitrogen balance criteria for assessing the efficiency of nitrogen sources for barley. Can. J. Soil Sci. 53, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Smith C J and Chalk P M 1980 Comparison of the efficiency of urea, aqueous ammonia and ammonium sulphate as nitrogen fertilizers. Plant and Soil 55, 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  17. van den Driessche R 1971 Response of conifer seedlings to nitrate and ammonium sources of nitrogen. Plant and Soil 34, 421–439.

    Google Scholar 

  18. van den Driessche R 1978 Response of Douglas fir seedlings to nitrate and ammonium nitrogen sources at different levels of pH and iron supply. Plant and Soil 49, 607–623.

    Google Scholar 

  19. van den Driessche R and Dangerfield J 1975 Response of Douglas-fir seedlings to nitrate and ammonium nitrogen sources under various environmental conditions. Plant and Soil 42, 685–702.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Volk G M 1970 Gaseous loss of ammonia from prilled urea applied to slash pine. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 34, 513–516.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pang, P.C.K. Distribution and recovery of15N after fertilization of Douglas-fir saplings with different nitrogen sources. Plant Soil 84, 167–174 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143180

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02143180

Key words

Navigation