Summary
If one takes into consideration modern communication and family systems theory, it is apparent that the therapist's effectiveness may be greatly hampered in situations where she works with the child alone in a play therapy situation. Seeing a child alone in play therapy often tends to play into the already existing double bind situations in a family. The family aims at rejecting new behavior patterns which emerge because it has adapted to the problem behavior. By seeing the child and related family members, an open therapeutic contract can be established aimed at educating and preparing the family to be more receptive to new behaviors via new means of communication. The therapist becomes the active intervening agent in the system, available to all of the members. With the therapist serving as the nurturer which the family lacked, its members learn how to be available to each other in a new way. Once nurturance occurs, the family members feel strengthened to maturate and respond differently to each other.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bateson, G., et al. A note on the double bind—1962.Family Process, 1963,2 (1), 154–161.
Bateson, G., Jackson, J., & Weakland, J. Toward a theory of schizophrenia.Behavioral Science, 1956, 1, 251–264.
Carroll, E. J. Family therapy and some observations and comparisons.Family Process, 1964, 3(1), 178–185.
Erikson, G. Teaching family therapy.Journal of Education for Social Work, 1973, 9(3), 9–15.
Haley, J. Family experiments: A new type of experimentation.Family Process, 1962, 1(2), 265–293.
Haley, J.Strategies of psychotherapy. New York: Grune and Stratton Inc., 1963.
Haley, J. Why a mental health clinic should avoid family therapy.Journal of Marriage and Family Counseling, 1975, 1(1), 3–13.
Lesoff, R. Foster's technique: A systematic approach to family therapy.Clinical Social Work Journal, 1975, 3(1), 32–45.
Pollack, O.Integrating sociological and psychoanalytic concepts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1956.
Ruesch, J., & Bateson, G.Communication: The social matrix of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1951.
Sullivan, H. S.The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1953.
Sullivan, H. S.The psychiatric interview. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1954.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D.:Pragmatics of human communication. New York: W. W. Norton and Co., 1967.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Furgeri, L.B. The futility of child therapy. Clin Soc Work J 4, 25–33 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142635
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02142635