Abstract
PURPOSE: In patients undergoing colectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, controversy exists regarding the necessity for and appropriate extent of rectal mucosal resection. Our aim was to assess histologically the extent of anorectal smooth muscle resected at the time of mucosal proctectomy and to correlate this with postoperative bowel and anal sphincter function. METHODS: Surgical specimens of 79 patients undergoing colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis were examined histologically in a blinded fashion, and the content of smooth muscle in the mucosal proctectomy specimens was scored. Degree of smooth muscle resection was correlated with postoperative anorectal manometry and with functional outcomes, including stool frequency and nocturnal leakage of stool after 3 and 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Degree of smooth muscle loss correlated with decreased resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter as early as three months after surgery (r=−0.26;P=0.03), and the correlation was even stronger after 12 months (r=−0.37;P=0.005). Decreases in resting pressure were related, in turn, to increased stool frequency at 12 months (r=0.32;P=0.02), but stool frequency was also inversely related to volume of the ileal pouch (r=−0.27;P=0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that resting pressure and pouch volume were both significant determinants of stool frequency. The likelihood of nocturnal stool leakage at 12 months was primarily a function of stool frequency (P<0.01) but also increased with patient age (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that loss of resting pressure of the internal anal sphincter can be correlated with the extent of smooth muscle resection during rectal mucosectomy and that these factors, in turn, correlate with increased stool frequency and a greater likelihood of nocturnal stool leakage. Consequently, an optimum functional result requires care in identifying and preserving maximum anorectal smooth muscle during mucosectomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ravitch MM, Sabiston DL Jr. Anal ileostomy with preservation of the sphincter: a proposed operation in patients requiring total colectomy for benign lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947;84:1095–9.
Williams NS, Marzouk DE, Hallan RI, Waldron DJ. Function after ileal pouch and stapled pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1989;76:1168–71.
Snooks S, Henry MM, Swash M. Faecal incontinence after anal dilatation. Br J Surg 1984;71:617–8.
Becker JM, McGrath KM, Meagher MP,et al. Late functional adaptation after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Surgery 1991;110:718–25.
Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M,et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:459–66.
Kestenberg A, Becker JM. A new technique of loop ileostomy closure following endorectal ileoanal anastomosis. Surgery 1985;98:109–11.
Goes R, Beart RW Jr. Physiology of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: current concepts. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:996–1005.
Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerrmans R. The composition of anal basal pressure: anin vivo andin vitro study in man. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:118–22.
Holdsworth PJ, Sagar PM, Lewis WG, Williamson M, Johnston D. Internal anal sphincter activity after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: a study using continuous ambulatory manometry. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:32–6.
Becker JM, Raymond JL. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a single surgeon's experience with 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 1986;204:375–83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by the Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America. Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Seattle, Washington, June 9 to 14, 1996.
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, J.M., LaMorte, W., Marie, G.S. et al. Extent of smooth muscle resection during mucosectomy and ileal pouchanal anastomosis affects anorectal physiology and functional outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 40, 653–660 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140893
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02140893