Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 40, Issue 6, pp 647–652 | Cite as

Outcome of the pelvic pouch procedure in patients with prior perianal disease

  • C. S. Richard
  • Z. Cohen
  • H. S. Stern
  • R. S. McLeod
Original Contributions


PURPOSE: There is concern that patients with presumed ulcerative colitis and significant perianal disease may in fact have Crohn's disease. Moreover, prior perianal disease may be an independent factor for poor outcome of the pelvic pouch. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of prior perianal disease on pelvic pouch outcome. METHODS: Between 1982 and 1994, 52 of 753 patients (6.9 percent) who had a pelvic pouch procedure were prospectively identified as having perianal disease. Outcome of the pelvic pouch of these 52 patients (Group I) were compared with the outcome of 701 pelvic pouch patients with no prior perianal disease (Group II). The perianal diseases identified in Group I were fissure-in-ano (17), perianal abscesses (13), fistula-in-ano (7), rectovaginal fistula (3), and significant hemorrhoids/skin tags (25). Eleven patients (21 percent) had more than one type of perianal disease. Twenty-seven patients (52 percent) required a total of 33 perianal operations for the different anal pathologies. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable for the following characteristics: age at time of pelvic pouch procedure, pathology (ulcerative colitis or indeterminate colitis), design of pouch, and type of ileoanal anastomosis (handsewn or stapled). An ileoanal anastomosis leak developed in 21 percent of patients (n=11) in Group Ivs.11.4 percent (n=80) in Group II (P<0.05). Perianal postoperative complications occurred in 11.5 percent of patients (n=6) in Group Ivs.1.7 percent (n=12) in Group II (P<0.05). Total pouch failure rate was not significantly different between the two groups (11.5vs.7.6 percent;P>0.05). Crohn's disease was subsequently diagnosed in 1.9vs.2.7 percent (P>0.05). Subgroup analysis of Group I patients showed no significant difference in outcome according to type of perianal lesion or a history of perianal surgery. CONCLUSION: Prior perianal disease significantly increases the risk of developing an ileoanal anastomotic leak and postoperative perianal complications. However, a pelvic pouch procedure may be an acceptable surgical alternative for selected ulcerative colitis patients with prior perianal disease because the overall pouch failure rate is not significantly increased.

Key words

Perianal disease Pelvic pouch procedure 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fazio VW, Ziv Y, Church JM,et al. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis complications and function in 1005 patients. Ann Surg 1995;222:120–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cohen Z, McLeod RS, Stephen W, Stern HS, O'Connor B, Reznick R. Continuing evolution of the pelvic pouch procedure. Ann Surg 1992;216:506–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grotz RL, Pemberton JH. The ileal pouch operation for ulcerative colitis. Surg Clin North Am 1993;73:909–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McLeod RS, Churchill DN, Lock AM, Vanderburgh S, Cohen Z. Quality of life of patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1991;101:1307–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pemberton JH, Phillips SF, Ready RR, Zinmeister AR, Beahrs OH. Quality of life after Brook ileostomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1989;209:620–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sagar PM, Lewis W, Holdsworth PJ, Johnston D, Mitchell C, MacFie J. Quality of life after restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic ileal reservoir compares favorably with that of patients with medically treated colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:584–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deutsch AA, McLeod RS, Cullen J, Cohen Z. Results of the pelvic pouch procedure in patients with Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:475–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gemlo BT, Wong DW, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, patterns of failure. Arch Surg 1992;127:784–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hyman NH, Fazio VW, Tuckson WB, Lavery IC. Consequences of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:653–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foley EF, Schoetz D Jr, Roberts PL,et al. Rediversion after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: causes of failures and predictors of subsequent pouch salvage. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:793–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Souza CM, McLeod RS, Baxter N, O'Connor B, Ng E, Cohen Z. Quality of life after the pelivc pouch procedure [abstract]. Can J Surg 1995;38:A24.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parker MC, Nicholls RJ. Restorative proctocolectomy in patients after previous intestinal or anal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:681–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. S. Richard
    • 1
  • Z. Cohen
    • 1
  • H. S. Stern
    • 1
  • R. S. McLeod
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, IBD Clinical Research Unit, Mount Sinai HospitalUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations