Skip to main content
Log in

Relationships between root permeability to water, leaf conductance and transpiration rate in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The relations between leaf conductance (gl) transpiration rate and root permeability to water (Rp) of three sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars grown in a controlled environment cabinet are described.

No differences in transpiration rates were found but it was shown that plants with low values of Rp have active stomatal closure with favourable consequences for water use efficiency under water limiting conditions.

Rp was estimated by applying hydrostatic pressure on the root system. Values of Rp per unit root volume ranged from 0.34×10−5 to 16.75×10−5 (s MPa−1). There were significant inter-cultivar differences (P<0.05) in Rp and gl and an inverse correlation between Rp and the maximum values cf gl within cultivars.

Pressure applied on the root system is proposed as a useful tool for the determination of differences in the root permeability to water amongst sunflower cultivars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aston M J and Lawlor D W 1979 The relationship between transpiration, root water uptake, and leaf water potential. J. Exp. Bot. 30, 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Black C R 1979 A quantitative study of the resistance of transpirational water movement in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). J. Exp. Bot. 30, 947–953.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyer J S 1971 Resistances to water transport in soybean, bean and sunflower. Crop Sci. 11, 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Briggs G M and Wiebe H H 1982 The effects of root pruning on the water relations ofHelianthus annuus L. J. Exp. Bot. 33, 966–976.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Coutts M P 1980 Control of water loss by actively growing Stika Spruce seedlings after transplanting. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 1587–1597.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen R D, Taylor S A and Wiebe H H 1961 Negative transport and resistance to water flow through plants. Plant Physiol. 36, 633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kramer P J 1969 Plant and Soil Water Relationships: a Modern Synthesis. McGraw-Hill, New York 482 p.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuiper P J C 1964 Water transport across root cell membranes: effect of alkenylsuccinic acids. Science 143, 690–691.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopushinsky W 1964 Effect of water movement on ion movement into the xylem of tomato roots. Plant Physiol. 39, 494–501.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Macklon A E S and Weatherley P E 1965 Controlled environment studies of the nature and origins of water deficits in plants. New Phytol. 64, 414–427.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mees G C and Weatherley P E 1957 The mechanism of water absorption by roots. I. Preliminary studies on the effects of hydrostatic pressure gradients. Proc. R. Soc. (London) B., 147, 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann H H, Thurtell G W and Stevenson K R 1974In situ measurements of leaf water potential and resistance to water flow in corn, soybean and sunflower at several transpiration rates. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54, 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newman E I 1973 Permeability to water of the roots of five herbaceous species. New Phytol. 72, 547–555.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Newman E I 1974 Root and soil water relations.In The Plant Root and Its Environment. Ed. E W Carson pp 363–440. University Press of Virginia. Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Passioura J B 1972 The effect of root geometry on the yield of wheat growing on stored water. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23, 745–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Passioura J B 1980 The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Salisbury F B and Ross C W 1978 Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Co. Belmont. California. 442 p.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shibles R, Anderson I C and Gibson A H 1975 Soybean.In Crop Physiology. Ed. L T Evans. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stoker R and Weatherley P E 1971 The influence of the root system on leaf water potential. New Phytol. 70, 547–554.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tinklin R and Weatherley P E 1966 On the relationship between transpiration rate and leaf water potential. New Phytol. 65, 509–517.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernandez, L.F., Orioli, G.A. Relationships between root permeability to water, leaf conductance and transpiration rate in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars. Plant Soil 85, 229–235 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139627

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139627

Key words

Navigation