Skip to main content
Log in

Peers, parents, and adolescent drug use in a rural community: A two-wave panel study

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relative influence of changes in orientations to ward peers and parents on the drug-use patterns of a panel of rural youths. It was hypothesized that, when the changes in orientations that occurred over a three-year period of time were evaluated, the level of involvement with either alcohol or marijuana would be highest for those youths experiencing movement toward positions sympathetic to the use of drugs. The data analysis revealed that after three years there was greater distance between youths and their parents on the subject of drugs, and that those youths who experienced the greatest movement were also the most heavily involved with drugs. The single best predictor of the use rate for either type of drug was the level of past use, followed by changes in the level of drug-related conflict with parents. Among the peer-based measures, changes in the frequency of both pro- and antidrug-use discussions were found to make a significant contribution only in the case of marijuana use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1985).Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., and Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 555–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. H., and Kandel, D. B. (1979). Attitudes and behavior: A specification of the contingency hypothesis.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 298–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, L. H. (1974). Student drug use and perceived peer drug environment.Int. J. Addict. 9(6): 851–861.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. K. (1955).Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang. MacMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D. (1976). Social control and social learning models of delinquent behavior — A synthesis.Criminology 14: 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D. (1977). Rejoinder.Criminology 15: 117–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, W. D. (1972).Deviance in Soviet Society: Crime, Delinquency and Alcoholism. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFleur, L. B., and Garrett, G. R. (1970). Dimensions of marijuana usage in a land grant university.J. Counsel. Psychol. 17: 468–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, B. S., and Griffin, C. T. (1978). Marijuana use among students and peers.Drug Forum 7: 155–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969).Causes of Delinquency. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huba, G. J., Wingard, J. A., and Bentler, P. M. (1980). Longitudinal analysis of the roles of peer support, adult models, and peer subcultures in beginning adolescent substance use: An application of setwise canonical correlation methods.Multivar. Behav. Res. 15: 259–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, C. H., and Nie, N. H. (1981).SPSS Update 7–9. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaquith, S. M. (1981). Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: An empirical test of the differential association theory.Criminology 19: 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. F. (1972). Parents, peers and delinquent action: An empirical test of the differential association perspective.Am. J. Sociol. 78: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, S. F., and Brownfield, D. (1983). Parents and drugs: Specifying the consequences of attachment.Criminology 21: 543–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessor, R., and Jessor, S. L. (1978). Theory testing in longitudinal research on marijuana use. In Kandel, D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. D. (1973).Marijuana Users and Drug Subcultures. John Wiley, & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., Backman, J. G., and O'Malley, P. M. (1979).Drugs and the Class of '78: Attitudes and Recent National Trends. National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, Md.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahle, L. R., and Berman, J. J. (1978). Attitudes cause behavior: A cross-lagged panel analysis.J. Person. and Soc. Psychol. 37: 315–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1974). Inter- and intragenerational influences on adolescent marijuana use.J. Soc. iss. 30: 107–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1975). Stages in adolescent involvement in drug use.Science 190: 912–914.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1978). Convergences in prospective longitudinal surveys of drug use in normal populations. In Kandel, D. B. (ed).Longitudinal Research in Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B. (1980). Drug and drinking behavior among youth.Ann. Rev. Sociol. 6: 235–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B., and Adler, I. (1982). Socialization into marijuana use among French adolescents: A cross-cultural comparison with the United States.J. Hlth. Soc. Behav. 23: 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B., Kessler, R. C., and Margulies, R. Z. (1978). Antecedents of adolescent initiation into drug use: A developmental analysis. In D. B. Kandel, D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues, Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, D. B., Treiman, D., Faust, R., and Single, E. (1976). Adolescent involvement in legal and illegal drug use: A multipel classification analysis.Social Forces 55: 438–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krohn, M., and Massey, J. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the social bond.Sociol. Q. 21: 529–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza-Kaduce, L., Akers, R. L., Krohn, M. D., and Radosevich, M. (1982). Conceptual and analytic models in testing social bonding theory.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassey, M. L., and Carlson, J. E. (1980) Drinking among rural youth: The dynamics of parental and peer influence.Int. J. Addict. 15: 61–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. S., and Velleman, J. D. (1974). Correlates of student drug use in a suburban high school.Psychiatry 37: 129–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. (1978). Some episodes in the history of panel analysis. In Kandel D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Halsted press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. H., Schuessler, K. F., and Costner, H. L. (1977)Statistical Reasoning in Sociology, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, T. L., Carter, T. L., and Pratt, M. C. (1981). Correlates of alcohol and marijuana use among rural high school students.Rural Social. 46: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penning, M., and Barnes, G. E. (1982). Adolescent marijuana use: A review.Int. J. Addict. 17: 749–791.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M., and Fogg, C. P. (1978). Psychological predictors of early use, late use, and nonuse of marijuana among teenage students. In Kandel, D. B. (ed.),Longitudinal Research on Drug Use: Empirical Findings and Methodological Issues. Halsted Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M. C., and Ekland-Olson, S. (1982). On social learning and deviant behavior: A reappraisal of the findings.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, F., Halsted, D. L., and Pascale, P. J. (1974). Differences among youthful users and nonusers of drugs based on their perceptions of parental behavior.Int. J. Addict. 9: 749–755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, D. C. (1982). On social learning and deviant behavior: A reappraisal of the findings.Am. Social. Rev. 47: 167–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streit, F., Halsted, D. L., and Pascale, P. J. (1974). Differences among youthful users and non-users of drugs based on their perceptions of parental behavior.Int. J. Addict. 9: 749–755.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, D. C. (1982). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory — A comment and critique.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 162–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, E. (1968). The “hang loose ethic” and the spirit of drug use.J. Hlth. Soc. Behav. 9: 146–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947).Criminology. Lippincott, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tec, N. (1972). Differential involvement with marijuana: A survey of suburban teenagers.J. Marriage Family 32: 656–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tec, N. (1973). The peer group and marijuana use.Crime Delinq. 18: 298–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, C. W., Petersen, D., and Zingraff, M. T. (1975). Student drug use: A reexamination of the “hang-loose ethic” hypothesis.J. Hlth. Soc. Behav. 16: 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, L. T., Jr., and Griffiths, C. T. (1983). Social learning and adolescent marijuana use: A trend study in a rural middle school.Rural Sociol. 48: 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfree, L. T., Jr., and Griffiths, C. T. (1985). Trends in drug orientations and behavior: Changes in a rural community, 1975–1982.Int. J. Addict. 20: 1503–1516.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. from the University of Montana. His research interests include death and dying in American jails and professional socialization in criminal justice vocations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Winfree, L.T. Peers, parents, and adolescent drug use in a rural community: A two-wave panel study. J Youth Adolescence 14, 499–512 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02139523

Keywords

Navigation