Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 215–228 | Cite as

Measuring change in academic self-concept resulting from curricular and instructional innovations

  • Lorin W. Anderson


The paper begins with a discussion of the psychometric and psychological problems involved in attempts to measure changes in human characteristics. The Rasch psychometric model is proposed as a model which has the potential of alleviating or eliminating many of the problems. The model is applied to a set of responses to an academic self-concept instrument administered to seventh-, eighth-, and ninth-grade students. Items that failed to conform adequately to the model at every grade level were eliminated from the scale. The resulting scale was found to possess several properties which permitted its use in the measurement of school-induced change in academic self-concept.


Health Psychology School Psychology Grade Level Psychological Problem Human Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Douglas, G. A. (1975). Test design strategies for the Rasch psychometric model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data.Am. Sociol. Rev. 9: 139–150.Google Scholar
  3. Harris, C. W. (ed.) (1963).Problems in Measuring Change, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  4. Merrill, M. D. (1971). Necessary psychological conditions for defining instructional outcomes. In M. D. Merrill (ed.),Instructional design: Readings, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  5. Rasch, G. (1960).Probabilistic Models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Nielsen and Lydiche, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  6. Scott, C. C. (1976). Academic self-concept: A corroborative measure. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  7. Wright, B. D. (1968). Sample-free test calibration and person measurement. InProceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
  8. Wright, B. D., and Douglas, G. A. (1974). Best test design. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Wright, B. D., and Mead, R. J. (1975). CALFIT: Sample-free item calibration with a Rasch measurement model. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Wright, B. D., and Panchapakesan, N. (1969). A procedure for sample-free item analysis.Educ. Psychol. Meas. 29: 23–48.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corp 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lorin W. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South CarolinaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations