Skip to main content
Log in

Social orientation and the social self-esteem of gifted and talented female adolescents

  • Published:
Journal of Youth and Adolescence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carlson's developmental theory of self-concept provides a theoretical explanation for equivalent levels of self-esteem among both sexes, despite sex differences in self-concept. The present study tests the applicability of Carlson's theory for a sample of gifted and talented female adolescents by examining three dimensions of possible self-esteem antecedents: actual talent ratings, self-perceptions of talent, and personality attributes. According to Carlson, talent ratings, self-perceptions, and personality attributes consistent with the feminine gender-role stereotype and a social orientation should emerge as positive predictors of the female adolescent's social self-esteem. Results of the regression analyses indicate that the best prediction of the social self-esteem of gifted and talented female adolescents is obtained from a combination of stereotypic feminine socially oriented and stereotypic masculine personally oriented predictor variables. For this sample, constructs such as androgyny appear to be more relevant to the understanding of social self-esteem than dichotomies such as personal-social orientation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bardwick, J. (1971).Psychology of Women: A Study of Bio-Cultural Conflicts, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1965). Stability and change in the adolescent's self-image.Child Dev. 36: 659–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodorow, N. (1974). Family structure and feminine personality. In Rosaldo, M., and Lamphere, L. (eds.),Woman, Culture and Society, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif., pp. 43–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, J. F., and Hock, R. A. (1981). Sex differences in sex role ideals in early adolescence.Adolescence 16: 779–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, E. S., and Hollinger, C. L. (1979).Project Choice: Creating her Options in Career Exploration, Education Development Center, Newton, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D. J., and Guire, K. E. (1976).Documentation for MIDAS. Statistical Research Laboratory, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, B., and Dolan, L. (1982). Affective characteristics of gifted children: Educational implications.Gifted Child Quart. 26: 172–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1933). The psychology of women. InNew Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieze, I., Prasons, J., Johnson, P., Ruble, D., and Zellman, G. (1978).Women and Sex Roles: A Social Psychological Perspective, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, R. L., and Spence, J. T. (1978). The Work and Family Orientation Questionnaire: An objective instrument to assess components of achievement motivation and attitudes toward family and career. JSASCat. Select. Doc. Psychol. 4.

  • Helmreich, R. L., Stapp, J., and Ervin, C (1974). The Texas Social Behavior Inventory (TSBI): An objective measure of self-esteem or social competence. JSASCat. Select. Doc. Psychol. 4: 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. (1977).The Self Directed Search. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1967).Feminine Psychology, Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E., and Jacklin, C. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, S. P. (1972).Education of the Gifted and Talented, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., and Bales, R. F. (1955).Family, Socialization and Interaction Process, Free Press, Glencoe, Ill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979).Conceiving the Self, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J., and Helmreich, R. (1978).Masculinity and Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, and Antecedents, University of Texas Press, Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., and Stapp, J. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measure of sex-role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. JSASCat. Select. Doc. Psychol. 4: 43–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Statistics. (1982).Employment and Underemployment During 1981: An Analysis, Special Labor Force Report No. 234, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wylie, R. C. (1974).The Self-Concept: A Review of Methodological Considerations and Measuring Instruments, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Neb.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a grant from the Women's Educational Equity Act, U.S. Office of Education Grant OE G00760497.

Received Ph.D. in educational psychology from Case Western Reserve University. Research interest is the career development of the gifted and talented.

Received Ph.D. from the University of California, Berkeley. Research interests include individual differences, the gifted and talented, and creativity.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hollinger, C.L., Fleming, E.S. Social orientation and the social self-esteem of gifted and talented female adolescents. J Youth Adolescence 14, 389–399 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02138834

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02138834

Keywords

Navigation