Advertisement

Interchange

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 31–41 | Cite as

The felt sense of studentry

  • Thomas J. Cottle
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Astin, A. W.The college environment, Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1968.Google Scholar
  2. Chickering, A. W.Education and identity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.Google Scholar
  3. Coopersmith, S.The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman, 1967.Google Scholar
  4. Cottle, T. J.The abandoners: Portraits of loss, separation and neglect. Boston: Little, Brown, 1973. (a)Google Scholar
  5. Cottle, T. J. Rationales for relevance in higher education.Interchange, 1973,4(1), 64–78. (b)Google Scholar
  6. Cottle, T. J., & Eisendrath, C. Of parents, children and psychology.Educational Forum, 1974,38, 135–143.Google Scholar
  7. Eisendrath, C., Cottle, T. J., & Fink, L.Out of discontent: Visions of the contemporary university. Cambridge: Schenkman, 1972.Google Scholar
  8. Ellison, A., & Simon, B. Does college make a person healthy, wealthy and wise? A social-psychiatric overview of research in higher education. In L. C. Solmon & P. J. Taubman (Eds.),Does college matter? Some evidence on the impacts of higher education. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 175–224.Google Scholar
  9. Erikson, E. H.Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: Norton, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. Feldman, K. A., & Newcomb, T. M.The impact of college on students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.Google Scholar
  11. Goethals, G. W., & Klos, D.Experiencing youth, Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.Google Scholar
  12. Heath, D. H.Explorations of maturity. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1965.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, D. H.Humanizing schools: New directions, new decisions. New York: Hayden, 1971.Google Scholar
  14. Jencks, C., & Riesman, D. Feminism, masculinism, and coeducation. In,The academic revolution. New York: Doubleday, 1968.Google Scholar
  15. Keniston, K.The uncommitted: Alienated youth in American society. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965.Google Scholar
  16. King, S.Personality change during college: Lives of Harvard men. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  17. Lipset, S. M.Rebellion in the university. Boston: Little, Brown, 1971.Google Scholar
  18. Mayhew, L. B. Dissent: A campus view.Change, 1972,4(5), 45–47.Google Scholar
  19. Mead, M.Culture and commitment. New York: National History Press, 1970.Google Scholar
  20. Metzger, W. P. The academic profession and its public critics. In R. A. Altman & C. M. Byerly (Eds.),The public challenge and the campus response. Berkeley: Center for Research and Development in Higher Education, University of California, 1971, Pp. 71–87.Google Scholar
  21. Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M.The American university, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
  22. Perry, W. G.Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  23. Reich, C.The greening of America, New York: Random House, 1970.Google Scholar
  24. Riesman, D. Commentary and Epilogue. In,Academic transformation: Seventeen institutions under pressure. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1973, Pp. 409–474.Google Scholar
  25. Sanford, N. (Ed.)The American college: A psychological and social interpretation of the higher learning. New York: Wiley, 1962.Google Scholar
  26. Snyder, B. R.The hidden curriculum. New York: Knopf, 1971.Google Scholar
  27. Trent, J. W., & Medsker, L. L.Beyond high school. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1968.Google Scholar
  28. Trow, M. The undergraduate dilemma in large state universities.Universities Quarterly, 1966,21, 17–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas J. Cottle
    • 1
  1. 1.Children's Defense Fund of the Washington Research ProjectWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations