Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 16, Issue 6, pp 527–539 | Cite as

Stereotypes of social isolation and early burnout in the gifted: Do they still exist?

  • Cecilia H. Solano
Article

Abstract

At the turn of the century, two common stereotypes of genius were that precocity was associated with social failure and that precocity bred early burnout. Later research on the gifted has refuted these stereotypes. The two studies in this paper investigate whether the stereotypes have changed in light of this new knowledge. In the first study, 66 male and 61 female colege students rated gifted, able, and average males and females. In the second study, 60 male and 59 female college students rated males and females with various extreme levels of precocity. In both studies, the stimulus persons were rated as high schoolers and as adults. Results indicate that the perception of the gifted, especially females, as encountering serious social problems is still prevalent. The illusion of burnout, however, has been replaced with an illusion of unqualified success.

Keywords

High Schoolers College Student Health Psychology Social Problem School Psychology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Austin, A., and Draper, D. (1981). Peer relationships of the academically gifted: A review.Gift. Child. 25: 129–133.Google Scholar
  2. Barbe, W. (1955). Career achievement of gifted students.Person. Guid. J. 34: 356–359.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. (1978).The Mad Genius Controvesy. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.Google Scholar
  4. Brody, L., and Benbow, C. (1986). Social and emotional adjustment of adolescents extremely talented in verbal and mathematical reasoning.J. Youth Adoles. 15: 1–18.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, B. (1979).Growing Up Gifted. Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  6. Faunce, P. S. (1967). Academic careers of gifted women.Person. Guid. J. 46: 252–257.Google Scholar
  7. Hollingworth, L. (1942).Children above 180 IQ. World Book, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Janos, P. M., and Robinson, N. M. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In Horowitz, F., and O'Brien, M. (eds.),The Gifted and Talented: Developmental Perspective. American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  9. Laycock, F. (1979).Gifted Children. Scott Foresman and Co., New York.Google Scholar
  10. Lombroso, C. (1895).The Man of Genius. Charles C. Scribner & Sons, London.Google Scholar
  11. Martindale, C. (1971). Degeneration, disinhibition, and genius.J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 7: 177–182.Google Scholar
  12. Newland, T. (1976).The Gifted in Socio-Educational Perspective. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Nichol, R. C., and Astin, A. W. (1966). Progrerss of the Mint Scholar: An eight-year following.Person. Guid. J. 44: 673–681.Google Scholar
  14. Oden, M. (1968). The fulfillment of promise: 40-year followup of Terman gifted group.Genet. Psychol. Monogr. 77: 3–93.Google Scholar
  15. Roe, A. (1952). A psychologist examines 64 eminent scientists.Sci. Am. 187: 21–25.Google Scholar
  16. Sears, P. (1979). The Terman genetic studies of genius. In Passow, A. (ed.),The Gifted and Talented: Their Education and Development. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  17. Sears, P., and Barbee, A. H. (1977). Career and life satisfactions among Terman's gifted women. In Stanley, J. C., George, W., and Solano, C. (eds.),The Gifted and the Creative. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  18. Solano, C. H. (1977). Teacher and pupil stereotypes of gifted boys and girls.Talents and Gifts, 19: 4–8.Google Scholar
  19. Tannenbaum, A. (1962).Adolescent Attitudes Toward Academic Brilliance. Bureau of Publications. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Terman, L. (1925).Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. Genetic Studies of Genius, Vol. I. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Terman, L. M. (1954). The discovery and encouragement of exceptional talent.Am. Psychol. 9: 221–230.Google Scholar
  22. Terman, L. M., and Oden, M. H. (1959).The Gifted Group at Mid-Life. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  23. Watley, D. J. (1969). Career progress: A longitudinal study of gifted students.J. Counsel. Psychol. 16: 100–108.Google Scholar
  24. Watley, D. J., and Kaplan, R. (1971). Career or marriage? Aspirations and achievement of able young women.J. Vocat. Behav. 1: 29–43.Google Scholar
  25. Whitmore, J. (1980).Giftedness, Conflict, and Underachievement. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecilia H. Solano
    • 1
  1. 1.Wake Forest UniversityWinston-Salem

Personalised recommendations